Sjöström A, Abrahamsson M
Department of Opthalmology, Sahlgren's Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Apr;72(2):195-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb05016.x.
In a previous experimental study on anaesthetized cat it was shown that a short latency (35-40 ms) cortical potential changed polarity due to the presence or absence of a pattern in the flash stimulus. The results suggested one pathway of neuronal activation in the cortex to a pattern that was within the level of resolution and another to patterns that were not. It was implied that a similar difference in impulse transmission to pattern and non-pattern stimuli may be recorded in humans. The present paper describes recordings of the short-latency visual evoked response to varying light flash checkerboard pattern stimuli of high intensity in visually normal and amblyopic children and adults. When stimulating the normal eye a visual evoked response potential with a peak latency between 35 to 40 ms showed a polarity change to patterned compared to non-patterned stimulation. The visual evoked response resolution limit could be correlated to a visual acuity of 0.5 and below. In amblyopic eyes the shift in polarity was recorded at the acuity limit level. The latency of the pattern depending potential was increased in patients with amblyopia compared to normal, but not directly related to amblyopic degree. It is concluded that the short latency, visual evoked response that mainly represents the retino-geniculo-cortical activation may be used to estimate visual resolution below 0.5 in acuity level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
