McKinley R K, Jamison J P
University of Leicester.
Ir Med J. 1994 May-Jun;87(3):84-5.
The use of and attitudes to peak flow meters and monitoring were surveyed in a random sample of general practitioners in Northern Ireland. There was an 87% response. Almost all general practitioners had a peak flow meter or spirometer in their practice but only 48% usually took a meter on home visits. The meters were more likely to be used for the diagnosis and management of asthma than chronic obstructive airways disease. General practitioners felt that meters were more useful when used in the consulting room than for domiciliary monitoring and that domiciliary monitoring was more useful in the management than the diagnosis of asthma. Although 79% of general practitioners felt that domiciliary peak flow measurement was useful for the management of asthma, only 3% of all asthmatic patients were using it. General practitioners' attitudes to peak flow monitoring are positive but they are not actually using them as much as they could.
我们对北爱尔兰全科医生的随机样本进行了关于峰值流量计的使用情况和态度以及监测情况的调查。回复率为87%。几乎所有全科医生在其诊所都配备了峰值流量计或肺活量计,但只有48%的人在进行家访时通常会携带一台。这些仪器用于哮喘的诊断和管理比慢性阻塞性气道疾病更常见。全科医生认为,这些仪器在诊室使用比在家中监测更有用,而且在家中监测在哮喘管理方面比诊断方面更有用。尽管79%的全科医生认为在家中测量峰值流量对哮喘管理有用,但所有哮喘患者中只有3%在使用。全科医生对峰值流量监测的态度是积极的,但他们实际使用这些仪器的程度并未达到应有的水平。