Suppr超能文献

[免疫电泳与其他M蛋白类别和类型测定方法的诊断价值比较]

[Comparison of diagnostic values of immunoelectrophoresis and other methods of determination of the class and type of M protein].

作者信息

Cieśluk S, Snigurowicz J, Rostkowska J, Kraj M

出版信息

Acta Haematol Pol. 1975 Apr-Jun;6(2):113-22.

PMID:808081
Abstract

Comparative analysis of immunoelectrophoresis (IEF) and several other laboratory methods used in the diagnosis of protein M showed that IEF is a method of choice in the immunological characterization of this protein, with the exception of IgM macroglobulin where the interpretation of the heavy chain and particularly of the light chain give better results in dilution immunodiffusion or immunochromatography. When the results are uncertain the simplest additional method to IEF seems to be dilution immunodiffusion and the best method is isolation of the observed protein by column chromatography and repeated determination of purified protein by IEF. With all these methods the lambda type of protein M is more difficult to determine than the kappa type.

摘要

免疫电泳(IEF)与用于诊断蛋白M的其他几种实验室方法的比较分析表明,除了IgM巨球蛋白外,IEF是对该蛋白进行免疫学特征分析的首选方法,在IgM巨球蛋白中,重链尤其是轻链的解读在稀释免疫扩散或免疫色谱法中能得到更好的结果。当结果不确定时,对IEF而言,最简单的附加方法似乎是稀释免疫扩散,而最佳方法是通过柱色谱法分离观察到的蛋白,并通过IEF对纯化蛋白进行重复测定。使用所有这些方法时,蛋白M的λ型比κ型更难测定。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验