Suppr超能文献

[免疫电泳与其他M蛋白类别和类型测定方法的诊断价值比较]

[Comparison of diagnostic values of immunoelectrophoresis and other methods of determination of the class and type of M protein].

作者信息

Cieśluk S, Snigurowicz J, Rostkowska J, Kraj M

出版信息

Acta Haematol Pol. 1975 Apr-Jun;6(2):113-22.

PMID:808081
Abstract

Comparative analysis of immunoelectrophoresis (IEF) and several other laboratory methods used in the diagnosis of protein M showed that IEF is a method of choice in the immunological characterization of this protein, with the exception of IgM macroglobulin where the interpretation of the heavy chain and particularly of the light chain give better results in dilution immunodiffusion or immunochromatography. When the results are uncertain the simplest additional method to IEF seems to be dilution immunodiffusion and the best method is isolation of the observed protein by column chromatography and repeated determination of purified protein by IEF. With all these methods the lambda type of protein M is more difficult to determine than the kappa type.

摘要

免疫电泳(IEF)与用于诊断蛋白M的其他几种实验室方法的比较分析表明,除了IgM巨球蛋白外,IEF是对该蛋白进行免疫学特征分析的首选方法,在IgM巨球蛋白中,重链尤其是轻链的解读在稀释免疫扩散或免疫色谱法中能得到更好的结果。当结果不确定时,对IEF而言,最简单的附加方法似乎是稀释免疫扩散,而最佳方法是通过柱色谱法分离观察到的蛋白,并通过IEF对纯化蛋白进行重复测定。使用所有这些方法时,蛋白M的λ型比κ型更难测定。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验