Ewald F W, Tenholder M F, Waller R F
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.
Chest. 1994 Sep;106(3):814-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.3.814.
The inspiratory flow-volume (FV) curve can be used to identify patients with upper airway obstruction, air trapping, and restriction. Current computed pulmonary function testing equipment often mandates a forced expiratory maneuver (FEM) immediately prior to the forced inspiratory maneuver (standard method). We evaluated the inspiratory FV curve with and without an antecedent FEM in 119 subjects referred for pulmonary function testing. The subjects were divided into four groups by grading the degree of airway obstruction using confidence intervals of the FEV1/FVC percent predicted minus the actual FEV1/FVC percent measured from the best FEM according to Intermountain Thoracic Society recommendations. The forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC), forced inspiratory flow 50 (FIF50), and peak inspiratory flow (PIF) from the inspiratory FV curve with an antecedent FEM was compared with the FIVC, FIF50, and PIF without an antecedent FEM in each category of obstructive lung disease. The FIVC without the antecedent FEM was significantly larger than that with an antecedent FEM by 170 ml (p < 0.002) in subjects with severe airway obstruction, but was not significantly different in the other groups. The FIF50 was not significantly different in any group, but approached significance in both normal subjects and subjects with severe obstruction. The PIF was not significantly different in any group, but approached significance in the normal subjects, order for patients with severe obstructive airway disease to generate a valid forced inspiratory FV curve, it should be obtained without an antecedent FEM. When a plateau of the inspiratory FV curve is encountered, we suggest that is useful to generate the inspiratory FV curve prior to the FEM and to analyze its flow and volume characteristics independent of the FEM. The "best" inspiratory FV curve should then be displayed with the "best" FEM for proper evaluation of the FV loop.
吸气流量-容积(FV)曲线可用于识别上气道阻塞、气体陷闭和限制性通气的患者。目前的计算机化肺功能测试设备通常要求在强制吸气动作之前立即进行强制呼气动作(标准方法)。我们对119名因肺功能测试前来就诊的受试者在有或无前驱强制呼气动作的情况下评估了吸气FV曲线。根据山间胸科学会的建议,通过使用预测的FEV1/FVC百分比减去从最佳强制呼气动作测得的实际FEV1/FVC百分比的置信区间来分级气道阻塞程度,将受试者分为四组。在每类阻塞性肺疾病中,比较了有前驱强制呼气动作时吸气FV曲线的强制吸气肺活量(FIVC)、强制吸气流量50(FIF50)和吸气峰流量(PIF)与无前驱强制呼气动作时的FIVC、FIF50和PIF。在严重气道阻塞的受试者中,无前驱强制呼气动作时的FIVC比有前驱强制呼气动作时显著大170毫升(p<0.002),但在其他组中无显著差异。FIF50在任何组中均无显著差异,但在正常受试者和严重阻塞受试者中接近显著水平。PIF在任何组中均无显著差异,但在正常受试者中接近显著水平。对于患有严重阻塞性气道疾病的患者,要生成有效的强制吸气FV曲线,应在无前驱强制呼气动作的情况下获取。当遇到吸气FV曲线的平台期时,我们建议在强制呼气动作之前生成吸气FV曲线,并独立于强制呼气动作分析其流量和容积特征。然后应将“最佳”吸气FV曲线与“最佳”强制呼气动作一起显示,以正确评估FV环。