Kopelman M D, Christensen H, Puffett A, Stanhope N
Neuropsychiatry and Memory Disorders Clinic, United Medical School, St Thomas's Hospital, London, U.K.
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Jun;32(6):675-91. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90028-0.
This paper describes the neuropsychological test performance of a patient who experienced a "fugue" episode (functional retrograde amnesia) lasting 7 days, but who continued to complain of a virtually complete loss of autobiographical memory for well over a year. Subsequent evidence revealed that she had been at least partially simulating her amnesia during this prolonged period. Neuropsychological testing took place soon after admission to hospital, at intervals thereafter, and after an Amytal abreaction, which produced a substantial recovery of her memories. On various anterograde tests, designed to detect simulation, the patient's performance was unimpaired, including recognition memory tasks, word-stem completion priming for "neutral" word-lists and for post-onset autobiographical material, and some aspects of semantic memory. However, her pattern of performance on an autobiographical and a remote News Event test differentiated her from patients with organic amnesia, because she showed a grossly disproportionate autobiographical memory loss and an extreme recency effect. In addition, a rating scale, on which she showed impaired feelings-of-knowing for items from her autobiographical memory, suggested simulation. On a word-completion task for pre-onset autobiographical material, she showed absent "priming" relative to "baseline" material. However, following the Amytal abreaction, there was a substantial improvement on this task, relative to recognition and cued recall performance. This finding has been interpreted within an hierarchical model of awareness in memory, derived from studies of normal memory and organic amnesia; and it is suggested that patients with "psychogenic amnesia" may manifest different levels of awareness for differing memories.
本文描述了一名经历了持续7天的“神游”发作(功能性逆行性遗忘)的患者的神经心理学测试表现,但该患者在一年多的时间里一直抱怨自己几乎完全丧失了自传体记忆。随后的证据显示,在这段延长的时间里,她至少部分地在假装失忆。神经心理学测试在患者入院后不久、此后定期进行,以及在一次阿米妥钠诱导的精神发泄后进行,这次精神发泄使她的记忆有了显著恢复。在各种旨在检测假装行为的顺行性测试中,患者的表现未受损害,包括识别记忆任务、针对“中性”单词列表和发病后自传体材料的词干补笔启动,以及语义记忆的某些方面。然而,她在自传体和远期新闻事件测试中的表现模式与器质性失忆患者不同,因为她表现出自传体记忆丧失严重不成比例以及极端的近因效应。此外,一个评分量表显示,她对自传体记忆中的项目的知晓感受损,这表明存在假装行为。在一项针对发病前自传体材料的单词完成任务中,相对于“基线”材料,她表现出缺乏“启动”效应。然而,在阿米妥钠诱导的精神发泄后,相对于识别和线索回忆表现,这项任务有了显著改善。这一发现已在一个从正常记忆和器质性失忆研究中得出的记忆意识层次模型中得到解释;并且有人提出,患有“心因性失忆症”的患者可能对不同的记忆表现出不同程度的意识。