Pollak M H
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Tulsa 74107.
Psychosom Med. 1994 May-Jun;56(3):271-6. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199405000-00015.
This study investigated relationships between laboratory task-related heart rate reactivity and heart rate responses in two daily life settings. The main purpose of the study was to demonstrate that the expression of heart rate reactivity during daily life depends on the nature of the daily life situation, or on subjective or behavioral responses in the daily life situation. Twenty-six healthy, male medical students completed one laboratory session consisting of pretask rest, reaction time, video game, and mental arithmetic conditions, and 2 day-long field study periods, during which subjects either worked as student physicians in a medical clinic or attended classroom lectures. After controlling for differences in daily life physical activity levels, (1) heart rate levels were significantly higher during clinic work periods, compared to classroom work periods and evenings of both days, (2) and heart rate responses to the tasks correlated significantly with minimum, mean, and maximum heart rate responses from the clinic work period, but not from the other field periods. Thus, individual differences in heart rate reactivity were found in one daily life situation, but not in another daily life situation. These results support the experimental hypothesis.
本研究调查了实验室任务相关的心率反应性与两种日常生活场景中心率反应之间的关系。该研究的主要目的是证明日常生活中心率反应性的表现取决于日常生活场景的性质,或取决于日常生活场景中的主观或行为反应。26名健康的男性医学生完成了一个实验室环节,包括任务前休息、反应时间、电子游戏和心算条件,以及两个为期一天的实地研究阶段,在此期间,受试者要么在医疗诊所担任实习医生,要么参加课堂讲座。在控制了日常生活身体活动水平的差异后,(1)与课堂工作时段和两天的晚上相比,诊所工作时段的心率水平显著更高,(2)并且任务的心率反应与诊所工作时段的最低、平均和最高心率反应显著相关,但与其他实地研究时段无关。因此,在一种日常生活场景中发现了心率反应性的个体差异,但在另一种日常生活场景中未发现。这些结果支持了实验假设。