Oschmann P, Kaps M, Völker J, Dorndorf W
Department of Neurology, University of Giessen, Germany.
Acta Neurol Scand. 1994 May;89(5):395-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02653.x.
CSF cytology, immunocytochemistry and biochemical tumor markers were compared in 12 patients with a meningeal carcinomatosis regarding diagnostic significance and therapy control; 50 samples were investigated. Cytology was tumor-positive in 39 samples and immunocytochemistry in 45 samples. Intrathecally produced tumor markers were found in 47 samples. On initial examination only immunocytochemical testing correctly classified all cases. Cytology and biochemical tumor markers revealed positive results in 10 respectively 11 of 12 patients, combined use of these two methods would increase the sensitivity to 100%. On follow-up examination tumor markers correlated best with symptoms and were early indicators for clinical relapse. These results could be achieved only if several monoclonal antibodies and biochemical tumor marker tests were combined. It is concluded that immunocytochemistry and biochemical tumor markers are of major help regarding the problems of false-negative cytology and reliable therapy control in meningeal carcinomatosis.
对12例脑膜癌病患者的脑脊液细胞学、免疫细胞化学和生化肿瘤标志物进行了比较,以探讨其诊断意义和治疗监测情况;共研究了50份样本。39份样本的细胞学检查呈肿瘤阳性,45份样本的免疫细胞化学检查呈阳性。47份样本中发现了鞘内产生的肿瘤标志物。在初次检查时,只有免疫细胞化学检测能正确分类所有病例。细胞学和生化肿瘤标志物在12例患者中分别有10例和11例呈阳性结果,联合使用这两种方法可将敏感性提高到100%。在随访检查中,肿瘤标志物与症状的相关性最佳,是临床复发的早期指标。只有将几种单克隆抗体和生化肿瘤标志物检测相结合才能得到这些结果。结论是,免疫细胞化学和生化肿瘤标志物对于脑膜癌病中假阴性细胞学问题和可靠的治疗监测有很大帮助。