Suppr超能文献

抑郁症的抗抑郁疗效与生活质量:吗氯贝胺与氟西汀的双盲研究

Antidepressant efficacy and quality of life in depression: a double-blind study with moclobemide and fluoxetine.

作者信息

Lonnqvist J, Sintonen H, Syvälahti E, Appelberg B, Koskinen T, Mannikko T, Mehtonen O P, Naarala M, Sihvo S, Auvinen J

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Jun;89(6):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01530.x.

Abstract

The efficacy of moclobemide (300-450 mg/day) was compared with fluoxetine (20-40 mg/day) in a double-blind, multicentre study in 209 patients with new episodes of depression selected from 612 consecutive depressed patients representative of those consulting psychiatric services in Finland. Antidepressant efficacy was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The Medical Outcome Study Short-form General Health Survey (SF-20) and 15D Measure of Quality of Life were used to measure effectiveness in terms of health-related quality of life. Efficacy was evident with both drug treatments, with 67% in the moclobemide group and 57% in the fluoxetine group having a reduction in HDRS of more than 50%. Similarly, 77% of the patients in the moclobemide group and 67% in the fluoxetine group were assessed on the CGI as much better or very much better after 6 weeks of treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea, other gastrointestinal symptoms, nervousness, dizziness and sleep disorders. Nausea was significantly more common in the fluoxetine group and was found especially in women. Premature terminations of treatment were 18% in the moclobemide and 21% in the fluoxetine group. A significant change for the better in quality of life was found in both treatment groups, even at week 2 but especially after 6 weeks of treatment. Improvement was not only seen in dimensions measuring depression or mental health but also in other dimensions.

摘要

在一项双盲、多中心研究中,对209例新发性抑郁症患者(这些患者选自芬兰612例连续就诊的抑郁症患者,能代表咨询精神科服务的患者群体)比较了吗氯贝胺(300 - 450毫克/天)与氟西汀(20 - 40毫克/天)的疗效。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表和临床总体印象量表(CGI)评估抗抑郁疗效。采用医学结局研究简明健康调查(SF - 20)和15D生活质量量表来衡量与健康相关的生活质量方面的有效性。两种药物治疗均显示出疗效,吗氯贝胺组67%的患者和氟西汀组57%的患者HDRS评分降低超过50%。同样,治疗6周后,吗氯贝胺组77%的患者和氟西汀组67%的患者在CGI量表上被评估为好多了或非常好多了。最常报告的不良事件为恶心、其他胃肠道症状、紧张、头晕和睡眠障碍。恶心在氟西汀组更为常见,尤其在女性中。吗氯贝胺组治疗提前终止率为18%,氟西汀组为21%。两个治疗组在生活质量方面均有显著改善,即使在第2周,尤其是治疗6周后。不仅在测量抑郁或心理健康的维度上有改善,在其他维度上也有改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验