• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与疼痛管理相关的成本问题:医疗保健政策与研究机构癌症疼痛小组的报告

Cost issues related to pain management: report from the Cancer Pain Panel of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

作者信息

Ferrell B R, Griffith H

机构信息

City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California 91010-0269.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 May;9(4):221-34. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90099-x.

DOI:10.1016/0885-3924(94)90099-x
PMID:8089538
Abstract

The clinical problem of unrelieved pain has received much attention over the previous decade with a major focus on cancer pain and acute postoperative pain. Organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Cancer Institute, the American Pain Society (APS), and others have addressed the previously neglected areas of pain assessment, pharmacologic treatment, and the knowledge and attitudes of health-care providers. Health-policy issues related to pain, including areas of cost, access to care, regulatory perspectives, and ethical and legal issues, have likewise been neglected. To explore the costs associated with pain, the following framework has been developed through the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) pain panel. This 13-point framework is an attempt to isolate specific cost issues, identify what is known in these areas, and address implications for future research. A brief synopsis of these 13 areas of cost analysis is provided including comments regarding work in progress by the panel and directions for future health-policy research related to pain management.

摘要

在过去十年中,疼痛未得到缓解这一临床问题受到了广泛关注,主要集中在癌症疼痛和急性术后疼痛方面。世界卫生组织(WHO)、美国国立癌症研究所、美国疼痛协会(APS)等组织已着手解决此前被忽视的疼痛评估、药物治疗以及医疗保健提供者的知识和态度等领域的问题。与疼痛相关的卫生政策问题,包括成本、医疗服务可及性、监管视角以及伦理和法律问题等领域,同样被忽视了。为了探究与疼痛相关的成本,医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)疼痛专题小组制定了以下框架。这个包含13点的框架旨在分离特定的成本问题,确定这些领域已知的情况,并探讨对未来研究的影响。以下提供了这13个成本分析领域的简要概述,包括对专题小组正在进行的工作的评论以及与疼痛管理相关的未来卫生政策研究方向。

相似文献

1
Cost issues related to pain management: report from the Cancer Pain Panel of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.与疼痛管理相关的成本问题:医疗保健政策与研究机构癌症疼痛小组的报告
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 May;9(4):221-34. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90099-x.
2
The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.比较疗效研究对介入性疼痛管理的影响:从医疗保险现代化法案到患者保护与平价医疗法案以及患者为中心的医疗成果研究所的演变。
Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):E249-82.
3
The First National Pain Medicine Summit--final summary report.第一届全国疼痛医学峰会——最终总结报告。
Pain Med. 2010 Oct;11(10):1447-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00961.x.
4
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom Management in Cancer: Pain, Depression, and Fatigue, July 15-17, 2002.美国国立卫生研究院科学现状会议声明:癌症症状管理:疼痛、抑郁和疲劳,2002年7月15 - 17日。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Aug 6;95(15):1110-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg014.
5
The role of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in improving outcomes of care.医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)在改善医疗结果方面的作用。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):521-42.
6
American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force.美国疼痛学会关于提高急性和癌症疼痛管理质量的建议:美国疼痛学会护理质量特别工作组。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1574-80. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1574.
7
NIH State-of-the-Science Statement on symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue.美国国立卫生研究院关于癌症症状管理的科学现状声明:疼痛、抑郁和疲劳
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(4):1-29.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15-17, 2002.美国国立卫生研究院科学现状会议声明:癌症症状管理:疼痛、抑郁和疲劳,2002年7月15 - 17日
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004(32):9-16. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/djg014.
10
Clinicians' quick reference guide to acute pain management in infants, children, and adolescents: operative and medical procedures. Pain Management Guideline Panel. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services.临床医生婴幼儿及青少年急性疼痛管理快速参考指南:手术及医疗程序。疼痛管理指南小组。美国卫生与公众服务部医疗保健政策与研究机构。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992 May;7(4):229-42. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(92)90079-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of cancer pain in developing countries: a narrative literature review.发展中国家癌症疼痛负担:叙述性文献综述
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Nov 2;10:675-691. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S181192. eCollection 2018.
2
Racial differences in the physical and psychosocial health among black and white women with chronic pain.患有慢性疼痛的黑人女性和白人女性在身体和心理社会健康方面的种族差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Oct;97(10):1369-77.
3
Pain management in the home.家庭中的疼痛管理。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005 Aug;9(4):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-005-0029-0.
4
Benefit-risk assessment of transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic pain.透皮芬太尼治疗慢性疼痛的获益-风险评估。
Drug Saf. 2003;26(13):951-73. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326130-00004.
5
Opioids in chronic pain management: is there a significant risk of addiction?阿片类药物在慢性疼痛管理中的应用:是否存在显著的成瘾风险?
Curr Rev Pain. 2000;4(2):112-21. doi: 10.1007/s11916-000-0044-0.
6
Cost considerations in patient-controlled analgesia.患者自控镇痛中的成本考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 1):109-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00002.
7
Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control.透皮芬太尼。其药理特性及疼痛控制治疗效果综述。
Drugs. 1997 Jan;53(1):109-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753010-00011.