Drobacheff C, Moulin T, Van Landuyt H, Merle C, Vigan M, Laurent R
Service de Dermatologie II, CHU Saint-Jacques, Besançon.
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1994;121(1):34-6.
The tertiary cutaneous syphilis is now extremely rare. We report a case of tubercular cutaneous syphilis associated with neurological dysfunction. We emphasize the difficulties to interpret serologic and CSF tests for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis.
A 63 year-old-woman had nodular, purplish and painless cutaneous lesions on forehead and forearm for 6 months. The biopsy showed a dermohypodermic lymphoplasmocytic granuloma, without necrosis, with endothelitis. Syphilis serologic tests were positive: VDRL = 512 U; TPHA = 40,960 U; FTA abs: IgG = 72,000 U; IgM = 1,350 U; Nelson test = 100 p. 100 (1,200 U). HIV test was negative. There was a past history of a positive syphilis serologic test when the patient was 20-year-old. The patient complained of shaking and her family spoke of gradual mental deterioration and behaviour troubles. The neurological examination showed a major frontal syndrome, cerebellar dysfunction with dysarthria and a major labial and lingual tremor. There is no lymphocytosis nor increased protein in the CSF; VDRL test was negative, TPHA test was positive, FTA abs = 4,000 U (IgG), and TPHA was increased. Penicillin G 16 millions units/day was given intravenously for 20 days; a slow increase was made in association with steroids at the beginning. The cutaneous lesions regressed in 14 days, but the neurologic state did not change. Six months later, there was still no IgM, TPHA decreased and VDRL was unchanged.
While the diagnosis of tertiary cutaneous syphilis was correct, the neurological abnormalities are difficult to classify. The symptoms were those of general paresis, but there is no argument favouring biological CSF activity (no increase in protein or lymphocytosis, negative VDRL). Nevertheless, in the context of very positive serologic tests and tertiary cutaneous syphilis, we treated this case as a neurological syphilis. The treatment regimen and the need of current cures are still under discussion.
三期皮肤梅毒现在极为罕见。我们报告一例伴有神经功能障碍的结核性皮肤梅毒病例。我们强调在解释用于诊断神经梅毒的血清学和脑脊液检查结果时存在困难。
一名63岁女性前额和前臂出现结节性、紫色且无痛的皮肤损害6个月。活检显示真皮皮下淋巴细胞浆细胞性肉芽肿,无坏死,伴有血管内膜炎。梅毒血清学检查呈阳性:性病研究实验室试验(VDRL)=512单位;梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA)=40,960单位;荧光螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA abs):IgG =72,000单位;IgM =1,350单位;尼尔森试验=100%(1,200单位)。艾滋病毒检测为阴性。患者20岁时梅毒血清学检查曾呈阳性。患者主诉震颤,其家人称其有逐渐的精神衰退和行为问题。神经系统检查显示严重的额叶综合征、伴有构音障碍的小脑功能障碍以及严重的唇舌震颤。脑脊液中无淋巴细胞增多也无蛋白质增加;VDRL试验为阴性,TPHA试验为阳性,FTA abs =4,000单位(IgG),且TPHA升高。静脉给予青霉素G 1600万单位/天,持续20天;开始时联合使用类固醇缓慢增加剂量。皮肤损害在14天内消退,但神经状态未改变。6个月后,仍无IgM,TPHA降低,VDRL未变。
虽然三期皮肤梅毒的诊断是正确的,但神经异常难以分类。症状符合全身麻痹,但没有证据支持脑脊液生物学活性(蛋白质或淋巴细胞无增加,VDRL阴性)。然而,在血清学检查结果非常阳性且为三期皮肤梅毒的情况下,我们将此病例视为神经梅毒进行治疗。治疗方案和当前治愈的必要性仍在讨论中。