• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部外部保护器对髋部骨折的影响。

Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures.

作者信息

Lauritzen J B, Petersen M M, Lund B

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery U 2161, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Lancet. 1993 Jan 2;341(8836):11-3. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92480-h.

DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92480-h
PMID:8093267
Abstract

Most hip fractures seem to be related to trauma near the hip, so a controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effect of external hip protectors on the prevention of such fractures in residents of a nursing home. 10 of the 28 wards in the nursing home were randomised to receive external hip protectors; thus 167 women and 80 men were given protectors and 277 and 141 men no protectors. A fall register was set up for 2 treatment wards (45 residents) and 2 control wards (76 residents). There were 8 hip and 15 non-hip fractures in the hip-protector group and 31 hip and 27 non-hip fractures in the control group. The relative risk of hip fractures among women and men in the intervention group was 0.44 (95% CI 0.21-0.94). None of the 8 residents in the intervention group who had a hip fracture was wearing the device at the time of the fracture. 154 falls were registered and 20% of these falls produced a direct impact to the hip. In 25 falls direct impact to the hip was sustained at a time when hip protectors were not being worn, and 6 fractures were produced. The study indicates that external hip protectors can prevent hip fractures in nursing-home residents.

摘要

多数髋部骨折似乎与髋部附近的创伤有关,因此开展了一项对照试验,以研究外部髋部保护器对预防养老院居民此类骨折的效果。该养老院28个病房中的10个被随机分配接受外部髋部保护器;因此,167名女性和80名男性被给予了保护器,277名女性和141名男性未给予保护器。为2个治疗病房(45名居民)和2个对照病房(76名居民)设立了跌倒登记册。髋部保护器组有8例髋部骨折和15例非髋部骨折,对照组有31例髋部骨折和27例非髋部骨折。干预组中女性和男性髋部骨折的相对风险为0.44(95%可信区间0.21 - 0.94)。干预组8例髋部骨折的居民中,骨折发生时无一人佩戴该装置。登记了154次跌倒,其中20%的跌倒对髋部产生了直接撞击。在25次跌倒中,髋部在未佩戴髋部保护器时受到了直接撞击,导致6例骨折。该研究表明,外部髋部保护器可预防养老院居民的髋部骨折。

相似文献

1
Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures.髋部外部保护器对髋部骨折的影响。
Lancet. 1993 Jan 2;341(8836):11-3. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92480-h.
2
[External hip protectors against hip fractures. A randomized study in a nursing home].[用于预防髋部骨折的外部髋部保护器。在一家养老院进行的随机研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 May 17;155(20):1523-6.
3
Effectiveness of Hip Protectors to Reduce Risk for Hip Fracture from Falls in Long-Term Care.长期护理中护髋器降低因跌倒导致髋部骨折的效果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1397-1403.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
4
Risk of hip fractures in soft protected, hard protected, and unprotected falls.在软防护、硬防护和无防护跌倒中发生髋部骨折的风险。
Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;14(5):306-10. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.018275.
5
Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people.预防老年人髋部骨折的髋部保护器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 31;2014(3):CD001255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001255.pub5.
6
A randomised trial of hip protector use by frail older women living in their own homes.一项针对居家生活的体弱老年女性使用髋部保护器的随机试验。
Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;9(2):138-41. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.138.
7
Hip protectors in aged-care facilities: a randomized trial of use by individual higher-risk residents.老年护理机构中的髋部保护器:针对个体高危居民使用情况的随机试验。
Age Ageing. 2001 Nov;30(6):477-81. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.6.477.
8
Compliance with external hip protectors in nursing homes in Norway.挪威养老院中对外部髋部保护器的依从情况。
Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;10(6):344-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005124.
9
Availability and use of hip protectors in residents of nursing homes.养老院居民中髋保护器的可及性和使用情况。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1366-3. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
10
Will elderly rest home residents wear hip protectors?老年养老院居民会佩戴髋部保护器吗?
Age Ageing. 1998 Mar;27(2):195-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/27.2.195.

引用本文的文献

1
Vitamin D and hip protectors in osteosarcopenia: a combined hip fracture preventing approach.维生素D与髋部保护器在肌少性骨质疏松症中的应用:一种联合预防髋部骨折的方法
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025 Feb;26(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11154-024-09907-8. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Left Pubic Symphysis Fracture With Undiagnosed Ipsilateral Femoral Neck Fracture in an Elderly Female With Osteoporosis: A Case Report.一名患有骨质疏松症的老年女性左侧耻骨联合骨折合并同侧股骨颈未确诊骨折:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69203. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69203. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Does hip protector prevent falls and hip fractures? An umbrella review of meta-analyses.
髋部保护器能否预防跌倒和髋部骨折?一项对荟萃分析的综合评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05122-x.
4
A Description of Novel Uses of Hip Protectors in an Elderly Hip Fracture Population: A Technical Report.髋部保护器在老年髋部骨折人群中的新用途描述:技术报告
Cureus. 2022 Jan 8;14(1):e21028. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21028. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Hip protectors are cost-effective in the prevention of hip fractures in patients with high fracture risk.护髋器在预防高骨折风险患者髋部骨折方面具有成本效益。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1217-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05252-8. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
6
Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.髋关节保护器生物力学评估测试系统:系统评价。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jan;31(1):43-58. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05128-x. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
7
A comprehensive review of randomized clinical trials in three medical journals reveals 396 medical reversals.对三家医学期刊的随机临床试验进行综合回顾,发现有 396 项医学研究结果发生了逆转。
Elife. 2019 Jun 11;8:e45183. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45183.
8
Predictors of uptake and adherence to the use of hip protectors among nursing-home residents.养老院居民使用髋部保护器的接受度和依从性的预测因素。
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Aug 22;5(3):253-263. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0088-2. eCollection 2008 Sep.
9
[New strategies for exercise training in osteoporosis].[骨质疏松症运动训练的新策略]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 Nov;118(11):933-7. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0080-1.
10
Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people.预防老年人髋部骨折的髋部保护器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 31;2014(3):CD001255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001255.pub5.