Butterworth J F, Strichartz G R
Department of Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009.
Anesth Analg. 1993 Feb;76(2):295-301.
To determine whether alpha 2-adrenergic agonists inhibit impulse conduction, clonidine and guanfacine were applied to rat sciatic nerve fibers studied in vitro. Clonidine and guanfacine produced concentration-dependent, tonic inhibition of compound action potentials in large, myelinated A alpha fibers. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) of clonidine measured 2.0 +/- 0.8 mM (mean +/- standard deviation); the EC50 of guanfacine measured 1.2 +/- 0.2 mM. Clonidine was also less potent than guanfacine at phasic block of A alpha compound action potentials examined at 10 Hz. Both drugs inhibited tonic impulse conduction in C fibers in a concentration-dependent, reversible fashion, and produced greater inhibition of C fiber than A alpha compound action potentials at all drug concentrations. Again, clonidine appeared to inhibit C fiber compound action potentials (EC50 = 0.45 +/- 0.01 mM) with less potency than guanfacine (EC50 = 0.17 +/- 0.06 mM). We conclude that clonidine and guanfacine, unlike traditional local anesthetics, demonstrate a tendency toward steady-state differential nerve block wherein C fibers are blocked to a greater extent than A alpha fibers.
为了确定α2-肾上腺素能激动剂是否抑制冲动传导,将可乐定和胍法辛应用于体外研究的大鼠坐骨神经纤维。可乐定和胍法辛对大的有髓鞘Aα纤维的复合动作电位产生浓度依赖性的强直抑制。可乐定的50%有效浓度(EC50)为2.0±0.8 mM(平均值±标准差);胍法辛的EC50为1.2±0.2 mM。在10 Hz下检测Aα复合动作电位的相性阻滞时,可乐定的效力也低于胍法辛。两种药物均以浓度依赖性、可逆的方式抑制C纤维的强直冲动传导,并且在所有药物浓度下对C纤维复合动作电位的抑制作用均大于Aα复合动作电位。同样,可乐定抑制C纤维复合动作电位(EC50 = 0.45±0.01 mM)的效力似乎低于胍法辛(EC50 = 0.17±0.06 mM)。我们得出结论,与传统局部麻醉药不同,可乐定和胍法辛表现出一种稳态差异神经阻滞的倾向,其中C纤维比Aα纤维受到更大程度的阻滞。