Belli M, Cera F, Cherubini R, Haque A M, Ianzini F, Moschini G, Sapora O, Simone G, Tabocchini M A, Tiveron P
Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro-INFN, Padova, Italy.
Int J Radiat Biol. 1993 Mar;63(3):331-7. doi: 10.1080/09553009314550441.
During the upgrading of the radiobiological facility at the Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (LNL) we found that uncorrected values of the proton energy were used in the past. This circumstance prompted us to perform the re-evaluation of the physical parameters for all the proton beams used in our previous radiobiological investigations (Belli et al. 1987) and, subsequently, the re-evaluation of all our previous dose-response curves for inactivation and mutation induction (Belli et al. 1989, 1991). This re-evaluation leads to significant changes in the dose-response curves and in the RBE-LET relationships only at the two lowest energies (highest LET) used. These two points are not reliable for the identification of a peak in RBE-LET relationship for cell inactivation. In spite of that, the extent of the changes is not such as to modify the general conclusion previously drawn, pointing out that there is a LET range where protons are more effective than alpha-particles.
在莱尼亚罗国家实验室(LNL)对放射生物学设施进行升级期间,我们发现过去使用的质子能量值未经过校正。这种情况促使我们对之前放射生物学研究(Belli等人,1987年)中使用的所有质子束的物理参数进行重新评估,随后,对我们之前所有关于失活和突变诱导的剂量反应曲线(Belli等人,1989年、1991年)进行重新评估。仅在使用的两个最低能量(最高传能线密度)下,这种重新评估导致剂量反应曲线和相对生物效应-传能线密度关系发生显著变化。这两个点对于确定细胞失活的相对生物效应-传能线密度关系中的峰值并不可靠。尽管如此,变化的程度并不足以改变先前得出的总体结论,即指出存在一个传能线密度范围,在此范围内质子比α粒子更有效。