Doebbeling B N, Lehmann P F, Hollis R J, Wu L C, Widmer A F, Voss A, Pfaller M A
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242-1081.
Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Mar;16(3):377-83. doi: 10.1093/clind/16.3.377.
Candida species are important nosocomial pathogens, particularly in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. A variety of methods have been used to differentiate strains, but an optimal system has not been established. We compared methods for typing a panel of nine related isolates of Candida tropicalis from an outbreak of sternal wound infections as well as four unrelated control isolates of this species. (The genetic relationships of the nine isolates in the panel had been confirmed previously by restriction fragment analysis.) Typing was undertaken without knowledge of an isolate's origin. Karyotyping by contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) gel electrophoresis failed to distinguish between outbreak and control isolates. However, when chromosome-sized DNA was digested with SfiI, EagI, SacII, or NaeI and the fragments were separated by CHEF electrophoresis, the outbreak isolates were readily identified. The isoenzyme profiles of the outbreak isolates were identical and were distinctly different from those of the control isolates. While both isoenzyme profiles and the modified CHEF procedure were discriminatory, the latter is recommended as a relatively convenient and reproducible technique for comparison of types of C. tropicalis.
念珠菌属是重要的医院病原体,在免疫功能低下和重症患者中尤为如此。人们已使用多种方法来区分菌株,但尚未建立最佳系统。我们比较了对一组来自胸骨伤口感染暴发的9株热带念珠菌相关分离株以及该菌种的4株无关对照分离株进行分型的方法。(该组中9株分离株的遗传关系先前已通过限制性片段分析得到证实。)分型是在不知道分离株来源的情况下进行的。通过轮廓夹钳均匀电场(CHEF)凝胶电泳进行核型分析无法区分暴发分离株和对照分离株。然而,当用SfiI、EagI、SacII或NaeI消化染色体大小的DNA并通过CHEF电泳分离片段时,暴发分离株很容易被识别出来。暴发分离株的同工酶谱相同,且与对照分离株的同工酶谱明显不同。虽然同工酶谱和改良的CHEF程序都具有鉴别力,但推荐后者作为一种相对方便且可重复的技术用于比较热带念珠菌的类型。