Suppr超能文献

施立稳全国性监测研究:沙美特罗与沙丁胺醇在需要常规支气管扩张剂治疗的哮喘患者中的比较

Serevent nationwide surveillance study: comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol in asthmatic patients who require regular bronchodilator treatment.

作者信息

Castle W, Fuller R, Hall J, Palmer J

机构信息

Glaxo Group Research, Greenford, Middlesex.

出版信息

BMJ. 1993 Apr 17;306(6884):1034-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1034.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety of salmeterol and salbutamol in treating asthma.

DESIGN

Double blind, randomised clinical trial in parallel groups over 16 weeks.

SETTING

General practices throughout the United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS

25,180 patients with asthma considered to require regular treatment with bronchodilators who were recruited by their general practitioner (n = 3516).

INTERVENTIONS

Salmeterol (Serevent) (50 micrograms twice daily) or salbutamol (200 micrograms four times a day) randomised in the ratio of two patients taking salmeterol to one taking salbutamol. All other drugs including prophylaxis against asthma were continued throughout the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All serious events and reasons for withdrawals (medical and non-medical) whether or not they were considered to be related to the drugs.

RESULTS

Fewer medical withdrawals due to asthma occurred in patients taking salmeterol than in those taking salbutamol (2.91% v 3.79%; chi 2 = 13.6, p = 0.0002). Mortality and admissions to hospital were as expected. There was a small but non-significant excess mortality in the group taking salmeterol and a significant excess of asthma events including deaths in patients with severe asthma on entry. Use of more than two canisters of bronchodilator a month was particularly associated with the occurrence of an adverse asthma event.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment over 16 weeks with either salmeterol or salbutamol was not associated with an incidence of deaths related to asthma in excess of that predicted. Overall control of asthma was better in patients allocated to salmeterol. Serious adverse events occurred in patients most at risk on entry and were probably due to the disease rather than treatment.

摘要

目的

比较沙美特罗和沙丁胺醇治疗哮喘的安全性。

设计

双盲、平行组随机临床试验,为期16周。

地点

英国各地的全科诊所。

研究对象

25180例被全科医生认为需要定期使用支气管扩张剂治疗的哮喘患者(n = 3516)。

干预措施

沙美特罗(施立稳)(每日两次,每次50微克)或沙丁胺醇(每日四次,每次200微克),按服用沙美特罗与服用沙丁胺醇的患者比例为2:1随机分组。在整个研究过程中继续使用所有其他药物,包括哮喘预防药物。

主要观察指标

所有严重事件以及撤药原因(医疗和非医疗原因),无论是否被认为与药物有关。

结果

服用沙美特罗的患者因哮喘导致的医疗撤药情况少于服用沙丁胺醇的患者(2.91%对3.79%;χ² = 13.6,p = 0.0002)。死亡率和住院率与预期相符。服用沙美特罗的组有少量但无统计学意义的额外死亡,且在入组时患有重度哮喘的患者中,哮喘事件(包括死亡)明显过多。每月使用超过两罐支气管扩张剂尤其与不良哮喘事件的发生相关。

结论

沙美特罗或沙丁胺醇治疗16周与哮喘相关死亡率高于预期发生率无关。分配到沙美特罗组的患者哮喘总体控制情况更好。严重不良事件发生在入组时风险最高的患者中,可能是由于疾病而非治疗所致。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Comparison of Two Therapies on Asthma Control in Children.两种疗法对儿童哮喘控制效果的比较。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2020 Sep;33(3):127-135. doi: 10.1089/ped.2020.1196. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
6
Update on Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO): A Narrative Review.哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠(ACO)的最新进展:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 17;16:1783-1799. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S312560. eCollection 2021.
7
How does race and ethnicity effect the precision treatment of asthma?种族和民族如何影响哮喘的精准治疗?
Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2019;4(6):337-356. doi: 10.1080/23808993.2019.1690396. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Mortality in IMPACT: Confounded by Asthma?IMPACT研究中的死亡率:受哮喘影响而混淆?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 1;202(5):772-773. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1159LE.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验