van Schayck C P, Dompeling E, van Herwaarden C L, Folgering H, Verbeek A L, van der Hoogen H J, van Weel C
Department of General Practice, Nijmegen University, The Netherlands.
BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1426-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1426.
To examine the effect of bronchodilator treatment given continuously versus on demand on the progression of asthma and chronic bronchitis and to compare the long term effects of a beta 2 adrenergic drug (salbutamol) and an anticholinergic drug (ipratropium bromide).
Two year randomised controlled prospective 'crossover' study in which patients were assigned to one of two parallel treatment groups receiving continuous treatment or treatment on demand.
29 general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen.
223 patients aged greater than or equal to 30 with moderate airway obstruction due to asthma or chronic bronchitis, selected by their general practitioners.
1600 micrograms salbutamol or 160 micrograms ipratropium bromide daily (113 patients) or salbutamol or ipratropium bromide only during exacerbations or periods of dyspnoea (110). No other pulmonary treatment was permitted.
Decline in ventilatory function and change in bronchial responsiveness, respiratory symptoms, number of exacerbations, and quality of life.
Among 144 patients completing the study, after correction for possible confounding factors the decline in forced expiratory volume in one second was -0.072 l/year in continuously treated patients and -0.020 l/year in those treated on demand (p less than 0.05), irrespective of the drug. The difference in the decline in patients with asthma was comparable with that in patients with chronic bronchitis (asthma: 0.092 v -0.025 l/year; chronic bronchitis: -0.082 v -0.031 l/year). Bronchial responsiveness increased slightly (0.4 doubling dose) with continuous treatment in chronic bronchitis, but exacerbations, symptoms, and quality of life were unchanged. Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide had comparable effects on all variables investigated.
Continuous bronchodilator treatment without anti-inflammatory treatment accelerates decline in ventilatory function. Bronchodilators should be used only on demand, with additional corticosteroid treatment, if necessary.
研究持续给予支气管扩张剂与按需给予支气管扩张剂对哮喘和慢性支气管炎病情进展的影响,并比较β2肾上腺素能药物(沙丁胺醇)和抗胆碱能药物(异丙托溴铵)的长期效果。
为期两年的随机对照前瞻性“交叉”研究,患者被分配到两个平行治疗组之一,接受持续治疗或按需治疗。
奈梅亨大学集水区的29家普通诊所。
223名年龄大于或等于30岁、因哮喘或慢性支气管炎导致中度气道阻塞的患者,由其全科医生挑选。
每日给予1600微克沙丁胺醇或160微克异丙托溴铵(113名患者),或仅在病情加重或呼吸困难期间给予沙丁胺醇或异丙托溴铵(110名患者)。不允许进行其他肺部治疗。
通气功能下降情况、支气管反应性变化、呼吸道症状、病情加重次数和生活质量。
在完成研究的144名患者中,校正可能的混杂因素后,持续治疗的患者一秒用力呼气量每年下降-0.072升,按需治疗的患者为-0.020升/年(p<0.05),与所用药物无关。哮喘患者和慢性支气管炎患者的下降差异相当(哮喘:0.092对-0.025升/年;慢性支气管炎:-0.082对-0.031升/年)。慢性支气管炎患者持续治疗时支气管反应性略有增加(加倍剂量增加0.4),但病情加重次数、症状和生活质量未改变。沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵对所有研究变量的影响相当。
不进行抗炎治疗而持续使用支气管扩张剂会加速通气功能下降。支气管扩张剂应仅按需使用,必要时加用皮质类固醇治疗。