Wilken G B, Appleton C C
Medical Research Council, Natal, Congella, Republic of South Africa.
J Hosp Infect. 1993 Mar;23(3):223-8. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(93)90027-w.
The lack of availability of medicinal leeches is a major impediment to the widespread use of leech therapy for treatment of congested flaps and replants in southern Africa. An investigation into the suitability of an alternative leech, the indigenous southern African leech, Asiaticobdella buntonensis, was therefore started. The risk of hospital-acquired infection related to the use of leeches and the antibiotic sensitivities of bacteria isolated from the gastro-intestinal tract of wild-caught leeches were investigated. Eleven bacterial genera were isolated but Aeromonas were most frequently isolated, occurring in 82% of microbiological samples. All were sensitive to cefotaxime and amikacin. The gut-flora and their sensitivities to 19 antibiotics were similar to those reported for the traditional medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis. These results emphasize the need to anticipate unusual infections when prescribing prophylactic or curative antibiotics in the course of leech therapy.
药用蚂蟥难以获取是阻碍南部非洲广泛使用蚂蟥疗法治疗充血皮瓣和再植手术的主要因素。因此,人们开始研究一种替代蚂蟥——南非本土蚂蟥亚洲蛭(Asiaticobdella buntonensis)的适用性。研究了与使用蚂蟥相关的医院获得性感染风险以及从野生捕获蚂蟥的胃肠道分离出的细菌的抗生素敏感性。共分离出11个细菌属,但气单胞菌属分离频率最高,在82%的微生物样本中出现。所有分离菌对头孢噻肟和阿米卡星敏感。其肠道菌群及其对19种抗生素的敏感性与传统药用蚂蟥医蛭(Hirudo medicinalis)的报道相似。这些结果强调,在蚂蟥治疗过程中开具预防性或治疗性抗生素时,需要预见不寻常的感染情况。