Jowett A K, Vainio S, Ferguson M W, Sharpe P T, Thesleff I
Department of Pedodontics and Orthodontics, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):461-70. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.2.461.
Duplication of the msh-like homeobox gene of Drosophila may be related to the evolution of the vertebrate head. The murine homologues of this gene, msx 1 and msx 2 are expressed in the developing craniofacial complex including the branchial arches, especially in regions of epithelial-mesenchymal organogenesis including the developing tooth. By performing in vitro recombination experiments using homochronic dental and non-dental epithelial and mesenchymal tissues from E10 to E18 mouse embryos, we have found that the maintenance of homeobox gene expression in the tooth is dependent upon tissue interactions. In homotypic recombinants, dental-type tissue interactions occur, leading to expression of both genes in a manner similar to that seen during in vivo development. msx 1 is expressed exclusively in mesenchyme, both in the dental papilla and follicle. msx 2 is expressed in the dental epithelium and only in the mesenchyme of the dental papilla. In heterotypic recombinants, the dental epithelium is able to induce msx 1 expression in non-dental mesenchyme, this potential being lost at the bell stage. In these recombinants msx 2 was induced by presumptive dental epithelium prior to the bud stage but not thereafter. The expression of msx 1 and msx 2 in dental mesenchyme requires the presence of epithelium until the early bell stage. However, whereas non-dental, oral epithelium is capable of maintaining expression of msx 1 in dental mesenchyme throughout tooth development, induction of msx 2 was temporally restricted suggesting regulation by a specific epithelial-mesenchymal interaction related to the inductive events of tooth formation. msx 1 and msx 2, as putative transcription factors, may play a role in regulating the expression of other genes during tooth formation. We conclude that expression of msx 1 in jaw mesenchyme requires a non-specific epithelial signal, whereas msx 2 expression in either epithelium or mesenchyme requires reciprocal interactions between specialized dental cell populations.
果蝇中msh样同源异型盒基因的复制可能与脊椎动物头部的进化有关。该基因的小鼠同源物msx 1和msx 2在包括鳃弓在内的发育中的颅面复合体中表达,特别是在包括发育中的牙齿在内的上皮-间充质器官发生区域。通过使用来自E10至E18小鼠胚胎的同时间的牙齿和非牙齿上皮及间充质组织进行体外重组实验,我们发现牙齿中同源异型盒基因表达的维持依赖于组织间的相互作用。在同型重组体中,发生牙齿类型的组织相互作用,导致两个基因以类似于体内发育过程中所见的方式表达。msx 1仅在牙乳头和滤泡的间充质中表达。msx 2在牙齿上皮中表达,且仅在牙乳头的间充质中表达。在异型重组体中,牙齿上皮能够诱导非牙齿间充质中msx 1的表达,这种潜能在钟状期丧失。在这些重组体中,msx 2在芽期之前被假定的牙齿上皮诱导,但此后不再诱导。msx 1和msx 2在牙齿间充质中的表达在早期钟状期之前需要上皮的存在。然而,虽然非牙齿的口腔上皮能够在整个牙齿发育过程中维持牙齿间充质中msx 1的表达,但msx 2的诱导在时间上受到限制,这表明其受与牙齿形成的诱导事件相关的特定上皮-间充质相互作用的调节。msx 1和msx 2作为假定的转录因子,可能在牙齿形成过程中调节其他基因的表达。我们得出结论,msx 1在颌间充质中的表达需要非特异性上皮信号,而msx 2在上皮或间充质中的表达需要特殊牙齿细胞群体之间的相互作用。