Liewendahl K, Helenius T
Clin Chim Acta. 1975 Nov 3;64(3):263-72. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(75)90353-8.
A dual competitive protein-binding assay for serum thyroxine (T4) is described. The assay is called the "corrected" T4 index and can be performed simultaneously with the determination of total T4. This method correlated significantly with the free T4 index and the effective T4 ratio. The "corrected" T4 index was compared for precision and diagnostic accuracy with the effective T4 ratio and two different free T4 indices. Improved modifications of the thyroxine and triiodothyronine Sephadex uptake tests, used for calculation of the free T4 indices, are also reported. In spite of better precision, the "corrected" T4 index and effective T4 ratio gave twice as many incorect classifications of both hyper- and hypothyroidism as the free T4 indices. Previous reports on the effective T4 ratio and other basically similar tests might give an overly optimistic view of what can be expected in routine clinical practice. The free T4 index, which is a good estimate of the free T4 concentration, may still be the thyroid function test of choice when serum T4 and clinical impression are not in conformity.
本文描述了一种用于血清甲状腺素(T4)的双竞争性蛋白结合测定法。该测定法称为“校正”T4指数,可与总T4的测定同时进行。此方法与游离T4指数和有效T4比率显著相关。将“校正”T4指数与有效T4比率及两种不同的游离T4指数在精密度和诊断准确性方面进行了比较。还报告了用于计算游离T4指数的甲状腺素和三碘甲状腺原氨酸葡聚糖凝胶摄取试验的改进方法。尽管精密度更高,但“校正”T4指数和有效T4比率对甲状腺功能亢进和减退的错误分类数量是游离T4指数的两倍。先前关于有效T4比率及其他基本类似试验的报告可能对常规临床实践中的预期结果给出了过于乐观的看法。当血清T4与临床印象不一致时,游离T4指数作为游离T4浓度的良好估计值,可能仍是首选的甲状腺功能检查方法。