• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构居民艰难梭菌定植情况:患病率及危险因素

Clostridium difficile colonization in residents of long-term care facilities: prevalence and risk factors.

作者信息

Walker K J, Gilliland S S, Vance-Bryan K, Moody J A, Larsson A J, Rotschafer J C, Guay D R

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Sep;41(9):940-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06759.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06759.x
PMID:8104968
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the period prevalence of Clostridium difficile disease and asymptomatic carriage in the residents of long-term care facilities (LTCF) and to characterize the risk factors for colonization or associated disease.

DESIGN

Period prevalence survey.

SETTING

Two long-term care facilities in St. Paul, MN.

PARTICIPANTS

Specimens were collected from 225 LTCF residents.

MEASUREMENTS

The dependent variable was the culture result for C. difficile, which was isolated and identified using selective culture media and a commercial anaerobe identification kit. Tissue culture assay was used to detect the ability of each C. difficile isolate to produce toxin. Independent variables (including gender, age, race, current medical diagnoses, severity of underlying disease, case mix, current clinical symptoms, current medications, antibiotic use within 4 weeks prior to specimen procurement, and other pertinent history) were obtained from the current medical record of each participant.

RESULTS

Of 225 stool cultures that were obtained, 16 (7.1%) were positive for C. difficile. None of the residents with a positive culture was symptomatic. History of nosocomial infection and the use of antibiotics in general, cephalosporins, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), and histamine-2 blockers were significantly associated with positive C. difficile culture (P < or = 0.05) by univariate analyses. Trends towards significance (0.05 < 0.10) were noted for narcotic use, previous hospitalization, LTCF, and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Logistic regression analysis revealed significant, independent predictors of positive culture: antibiotic use in general (P = 0.028; relative risk = 3.31), histamine-2 antagonist use (P = 0.038; relative risk = 3.27), cephalosporin use (P = 0.038; relative risk = 4.66), and TMP/SMX use (P = 0.007; relative risk = 8.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antibiotics, particularly cephalosporins and TMP/SMX, is a significant risk factor for asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile in long-term care facilities. The use of H-2 blockers was also a significant risk factor for carriage; however, this finding has not been reported previously and should be confirmed by independent studies. These medications should be used judiciously in the LTCF population. When diarrheal diseases are encountered in LTCF residents, a high index of suspicion for C. difficile infection should be maintained and the appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic measures taken.

摘要

目的

确定长期护理机构(LTCF)居民中艰难梭菌病和无症状携带的期间患病率,并描述定植或相关疾病的危险因素。

设计

期间患病率调查。

地点

明尼苏达州圣保罗的两家长期护理机构。

参与者

从225名LTCF居民中采集标本。

测量

因变量是艰难梭菌的培养结果,使用选择性培养基和商业厌氧菌鉴定试剂盒进行分离和鉴定。采用组织培养试验检测每株艰难梭菌产生毒素的能力。自变量(包括性别、年龄、种族、当前医学诊断、基础疾病严重程度、病例组合、当前临床症状、当前用药、标本采集前4周内使用抗生素情况以及其他相关病史)从每位参与者的当前病历中获取。

结果

在获得的225份粪便培养物中,16份(7.1%)艰难梭菌检测呈阳性。培养阳性的居民均无症状。通过单因素分析,医院感染史以及一般抗生素、头孢菌素、甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP/SMX)和组胺-2受体阻滞剂的使用与艰难梭菌培养阳性显著相关(P≤0.05)。在麻醉药使用、既往住院、LTCF和非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病方面观察到有显著趋势(0.05<P<0.10)。逻辑回归分析显示培养阳性的显著独立预测因素:一般抗生素使用(P = 0.028;相对风险 = 3.31)、组胺-2拮抗剂使用(P = 0.038;相对风险 = 3.27)、头孢菌素使用(P = 0.038;相对风险 = 4.66)和TMP/SMX使用(P = 0.007;相对风险 = 8.45)。

结论

抗生素的使用,尤其是头孢菌素和TMP/SMX,是长期护理机构中艰难梭菌无症状携带的重要危险因素。组胺-2受体阻滞剂的使用也是携带的重要危险因素;然而,这一发现此前尚未见报道,应通过独立研究予以证实。这些药物在LTCF人群中应谨慎使用。当LTCF居民出现腹泻病时,应高度怀疑艰难梭菌感染并采取适当的诊断和治疗措施。

相似文献

1
Clostridium difficile colonization in residents of long-term care facilities: prevalence and risk factors.长期护理机构居民艰难梭菌定植情况:患病率及危险因素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Sep;41(9):940-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06759.x.
2
Asymptomatic carriers are a potential source for transmission of epidemic and nonepidemic Clostridium difficile strains among long-term care facility residents.无症状携带者是长期护理机构居民中流行和非流行艰难梭菌菌株传播的潜在来源。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15;45(8):992-8. doi: 10.1086/521854. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
3
Examining the epidemiology and microbiology of Clostridium difficile carriage in elderly patients and residents of a healthcare facility in southern Ontario, Canada.检查加拿大安大略省南部一家医疗机构中老年患者和居民中艰难梭菌携带的流行病学和微生物学。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic C. difficile in long-term care facilities: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors.长期护理机构中产毒艰难梭菌无症状携带者:患病率及危险因素的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0117195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117195. eCollection 2015.
5
Acquisition of Clostridium difficile Colonization and Infection After Transfer From a Veterans Affairs Hospital to an Affiliated Long-Term Care Facility.从退伍军人事务医院转入附属医院长期护理机构后艰难梭菌定植和感染的获得。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):1070-1076. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.140. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
The Attributable Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection to Long-Term Care Facilities Stay: A Clinical Study.艰难梭菌感染对长期护理机构住院患者的归因负担:一项临床研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1733-1740. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14863. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
7
Whole genome sequencing of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in asymptomatic carriers: insights into possible role in transmission.对无症状携带者产毒艰难梭菌的全基因组测序:对传播中可能作用的深入了解。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Jun;102(2):125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile in an Irish continuing care institution for the elderly: prevalence and characteristics.爱尔兰一家老年长期护理机构中艰难梭菌无症状携带者:流行率和特征。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Jun;179(2):245-50. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0361-1. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
9
Transmission of Clostridium difficile from asymptomatically colonized or infected long-term care facility residents.无症状定植或感染的长期护理机构居民中艰难梭菌的传播。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):909-916. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.106. Epub 2018 May 31.
10
Asymptomatic rectal colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Clostridium difficile among residents of a long-term care facility in New York City.纽约市一家长期护理机构居民中耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌和艰难梭菌的无症状直肠定植情况。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 May 1;44(5):525-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.11.021. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing in a teaching hospital in Korea.韩国一家教学医院中与不适当艰难梭菌检测相关的流行率及相关因素。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 May 13;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01111-0.
2
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Colonization in Long-Term Care Facilities Around the World: A Review.全球长期护理机构中多重耐药菌定植的患病率及危险因素:一项综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 7;10(6):680. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060680.
3
2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of () infection in surgical patients.
2019 年 WSES 外科患者()感染管理指南更新。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Feb 28;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0228-3. eCollection 2019.
4
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
5
Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂治疗与艰难梭菌感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 21;23(35):6500-6515. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6500.
6
Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization: epidemiology and clinical implications.无症状艰难梭菌定植:流行病学及临床意义
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 14;15:516. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1258-4.
7
WSES guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients.WSES外科患者艰难梭菌感染管理指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug 20;10:38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0033-6. eCollection 2015.
8
Asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic C. difficile in long-term care facilities: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors.长期护理机构中产毒艰难梭菌无症状携带者:患病率及危险因素的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0117195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117195. eCollection 2015.
9
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Diagnosis of Bacterial Gastroenteritis.临床微生物实验室实用指南:细菌性胃肠炎的诊断
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jan;28(1):3-31. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-14.
10
Development of TaqMan-based quantitative PCR for sensitive and selective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in human stools.基于TaqMan的定量PCR技术的开发,用于灵敏且选择性地检测人粪便中产毒素艰难梭菌。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111684. eCollection 2014.