Castor G, Klocke R K, Stoll M, Helms J, Niedermark I
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Jan;72(1):133-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.1.133.
To evaluate the accuracy of two non-invasive techniques for cardiac output (CO) measurement, we have measured CO simultaneously by thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB), pulsed Doppler ultrasound (DU) and standard thermodilution methods (TD) under different clinical conditions. Measurements were made in 10 patients: (I) during steady state anaesthesia with controlled IPPV ventilation (n = 131), spread over the entire ventilatory cycle; (II) during apnoea (n = 56); (III) during spontaneous breathing (n = 152) in the intensive care unit. Mean (SD) cardiac output values were: (I) COTD 3.5 (1.0) litre min-1, COTEB 3.4 (0.7) litre min-1, CODU 2.8 (0.7) litre min-1; (II) COTD 3.6 (0.6) litre min-1, COTEB 3.5 (0.4) litre min-1, CODU 2.9 (0.7) litre min-1; (III) COTD 7.7 (1.5) litre min-1, COTEB 7.6 (1.9) litre min-1, CODU 5.2 (1.4) litre min-1. The mean percentage deviation of TEB from TD ranged from -2.2% to 1.4% and that of DU from TD was from -16% to -32%. There were no statistically significant differences between TD and TEB, but TD and DU differed significantly during IPPV, apnoea and spontaneous ventilation (P < 0.0001).
为评估两种无创心输出量(CO)测量技术的准确性,我们在不同临床条件下,同时采用胸部电阻抗(TEB)、脉冲多普勒超声(DU)和标准热稀释法(TD)测量CO。对10例患者进行了测量:(I)在控制指令性间歇正压通气(IPPV)的稳态麻醉期间(n = 131),涵盖整个通气周期;(II)在呼吸暂停期间(n = 56);(III)在重症监护病房自主呼吸期间(n = 152)。心输出量的均值(标准差)分别为:(I)TD法3.5(1.0)升/分钟,TEB法3.4(0.7)升/分钟,DU法2.8(0.7)升/分钟;(II)TD法3.6(0.6)升/分钟,TEB法3.5(0.4)升/分钟,DU法2.9(0.7)升/分钟;(III)TD法7.7(1.5)升/分钟,TEB法7.6(1.9)升/分钟,DU法5.2(1.4)升/分钟。TEB与TD的平均百分比偏差在-2.2%至1.4%之间,DU与TD的平均百分比偏差在-16%至-32%之间。TD与TEB之间无统计学显著差异,但在IPPV、呼吸暂停和自主通气期间,TD与DU存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。