Suppr超能文献

阿司匹林敏感型哮喘患者气道对白三烯C4(LTC4)、白三烯E4(LTE4)和组胺的反应性。

Airway responsiveness to leukotriene C4 (LTC4), leukotriene E4 (LTE4) and histamine in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic subjects.

作者信息

Christie P E, Schmitz-Schumann M, Spur B W, Lee T H

机构信息

Swiss Institute for Allergy and Asthma Research, Davos.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1993 Nov;6(10):1468-73.

PMID:8112440
Abstract

We wanted to determine whether the airway response to inhaled leukotriene C4 (LTC4) is similar to inhaled leukotriene E4 (LTE4) in aspirin-sensitive asthma and, therefore, determined airway responsiveness to histamine, LTC4 and LTE4 in seven aspirin-sensitive subjects and 13 control asthmatic subjects, who were tolerant of aspirin. The concentration of inhaled lysine-aspirin which produced a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC15) was determined in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic subjects. The dose of histamine, LTC4 and LTE4 which produced a 35% fall in specific airways conductance (PD35sGaw) was determined by linear interpolation from the log dose response curve. There was no correlation between the PC15 for lysine-aspirin and the airway reactivity to inhaled LTC4 or LTE4. There was no difference in airway response to histamine and LTC4 between any of the groups of asthmatic subjects. There was a rank order of potency LTC4 > LTE4 > histamine in both groups, with LTC4 approximately 1,000 fold more potent than histamine in both groups. Aspirin-sensitive asthmatic subjects were significantly more responsive to LTE4 (p = 0.02) than aspirin-tolerant asthmatic subjects. The relative responsiveness of LTE4 to histamine (PD35 histamine/PD35 LTE4) was significantly greater in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic subjects compared to aspirin-tolerant asthmatic subjects (p = 0.05). There was no difference in relative responsiveness of LTC4 to histamine between aspirin-sensitive or aspirin-tolerant asthmatic subjects. We conclude that the airways of aspirin-sensitive asthmatic subjects demonstrate a selective hyperresponsiveness to LTE4, which is not observed for LTC4.

摘要

我们想确定在阿司匹林敏感型哮喘中,气道对吸入白三烯C4(LTC4)的反应是否与吸入白三烯E4(LTE4)相似,因此,我们测定了7名阿司匹林敏感型受试者和13名对阿司匹林耐受的对照哮喘受试者对组胺、LTC4和LTE4的气道反应性。在阿司匹林敏感型哮喘受试者中测定了使一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降15%的吸入赖氨酸阿司匹林浓度(PC15)。通过对数剂量反应曲线的线性插值法确定使特定气道传导率下降35%的组胺、LTC4和LTE4剂量(PD35sGaw)。赖氨酸阿司匹林的PC15与吸入LTC4或LTE4的气道反应性之间无相关性。在任何一组哮喘受试者中,对组胺和LTC4的气道反应均无差异。两组中LTC4、LTE4、组胺的效力顺序均为LTC4 > LTE4 >组胺,两组中LTC4的效力均约为组胺的1000倍。阿司匹林敏感型哮喘受试者对LTE4的反应性显著高于阿司匹林耐受型哮喘受试者(p = 0.02)。与阿司匹林耐受型哮喘受试者相比,阿司匹林敏感型哮喘受试者中LTE4相对于组胺的相对反应性(PD35组胺/PD35 LTE4)显著更高(p = 0.05)。阿司匹林敏感型或阿司匹林耐受型哮喘受试者中LTC4相对于组胺的相对反应性无差异。我们得出结论,阿司匹林敏感型哮喘受试者的气道对LTE4表现出选择性高反应性,而LTC4未观察到这种情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验