Nazir D J, Mori L, Padala V R, Wright R, McQueen M J
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hamilton General Division, Hamilton Civic Hospitals, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Biochem. 1993 Dec;26(6):477-82. doi: 10.1016/0009-9120(93)80012-j.
We evaluated a turbidimetric method for the estimation of apo A1 and apo B on the Ciba Corning 550 EXPRESS using Ciba Corning reagents. Interference due to bilirubin, hemoglobin, lipemia, triglycerides, and uremia was minimal, with apolipoproteins (apo) A1 and B results usually within +/- 4% of expected values. Within-run and day-to-day imprecision (coefficients of variation) ranged from 1.96 to 3.60% and 2.63 to 3.39% for apo A1 and 1.02 to 1.74% and 2.08 to 3.66% for apo B, respectively. Accuracy was determined by participation in the IFCC apolipoprotein standardization project in which results obtained on 50 patient samples were compared to those obtained by the reference laboratory. Apo A1 and apo B showed an average bias of +3.7% and +2.0% and correlation coefficients of 0.986 and 0.977, respectively. Results were also compared to those obtained on the Behring Turbitime system and showed a bias of +7.5% and -8.8% for apo A1 and apo B, respectively. The Ciba Corning automated method was rapid and gave good accuracy, precision, linearity, and parallelism and was relatively unaffected by raised triglyceride values.
我们使用汽巴康宁试剂评估了在汽巴康宁550 EXPRESS上采用比浊法测定载脂蛋白A1和载脂蛋白B的方法。胆红素、血红蛋白、脂血、甘油三酯和尿毒症造成的干扰极小,载脂蛋白(apo)A1和B的结果通常在预期值的±4%以内。载脂蛋白A1的批内和日间不精密度(变异系数)分别为1.96%至3.60%和2.63%至3.39%,载脂蛋白B的批内和日间不精密度分别为1.02%至1.74%和2.08%至3.66%。通过参与国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)载脂蛋白标准化项目来确定准确性,该项目将50份患者样本的检测结果与参考实验室的结果进行比较。载脂蛋白A1和载脂蛋白B的平均偏差分别为+3.7%和+2.0%,相关系数分别为0.986和0.977。还将结果与在拜耳Turbitime系统上获得的结果进行比较,结果显示载脂蛋白A1和载脂蛋白B的偏差分别为+7.5%和 -8.8%。汽巴康宁自动化方法快速,具有良好的准确性、精密度、线性和平行性,并且相对不受甘油三酯值升高的影响。