Epkins C C
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5214.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1993 Dec;21(6):649-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00916448.
Using equivalent scales, the differential utility of teachers' ratings of elementary school (n = 142) and inpatient (n = 83) 8- to 12-year-old children was examined by comparing teachers' correspondence with the inpatient and elementary school children's self-reports of depression, anxiety, and aggression. Teacher-child correspondence was significant for all three traits in the elementary school sample, yet only significant for aggression in the inpatient sample. However, the level or severity of depression and anxiety symptoms that the teachers reported for the inpatient sample was similar to that reported by the children themselves. In contrast, elementary school children reported significantly more internalizing symptoms than their teachers. Inpatient children reported more depression, but not significantly more anxiety and aggression than elementary school children. For all traits, teachers reported significantly more symptoms for inpatient children, after controlling for child self-report and socioeconomic status. The utility of teachers' ratings across samples, method variance and rater biases, and issues pertaining to self-report are discussed.
使用等效量表,通过比较教师对小学(n = 142)和住院部(n = 83)8至12岁儿童的评分与住院儿童和小学儿童的抑郁、焦虑及攻击行为自我报告之间的一致性,来检验教师评分的差异效用。在小学样本中,教师与儿童在所有这三个特质上的一致性都很显著,但在住院部样本中仅在攻击行为上显著。然而,教师报告的住院部样本中抑郁和焦虑症状的水平或严重程度与儿童自己报告的相似。相比之下,小学儿童报告的内化症状明显多于他们的教师。住院儿童报告的抑郁更多,但焦虑和攻击行为并不比小学儿童显著更多。在控制了儿童自我报告和社会经济地位后,教师报告的住院儿童所有特质的症状都显著更多。本文讨论了跨样本教师评分的效用、方法方差和评分者偏差以及与自我报告相关的问题。