Geck P, Heinz E
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Aug 4;443(1):49-63. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90490-9.
In a previous paper kinetic equations of secondary active transport by cotransport have been derived. In the present paper these equations have been expanded by including the effect of an electrical potential difference in order to make them applicable to the more realistic systems of secondary active transport driven by the gradients of Na+ or H+. Thermodynamically an electrical potential difference is as a driving force fully exchangeable with an equivalent chemical potential difference. This is not necessarily so for the kinetics of co-transport. It is not always the same whether a given difference in electrochemical activity of the driver ion is mainly osmotic, i.e. due to difference in concentration, or electric, i.e. due to a difference in the electrochemical activity coefficient. In most cases a difference in concentration is more effective in driving co-transport than is an equivalent difference in electrical potential leading to the same difference in electrical activity. The effectiveness of the latter highly depends on the model, whether it is of the affinity type or of the velocity type, but also on whether the loaded or the unloaded carrier bears an electrical charge. With the same electrical potential difference co-transport is as a rule faster if the ternary complex rather than the empty carrier is charged. Also the "standard parameters", (see Glossary, page 62) Jmax and Km, of the overall transport respond differently to the introduction of an electrical potential difference, depending on the model. So an electrical potential difference will mostly affect Km if the loaded carrier is ionic, and mostly Jmax if the empty carrier is ionic, provided that the mobility of the loaded carrier is greater than that of the empty one. On the other hand, distinctive criteria between affinity type and velocity type models are partly affected by an electrical potential difference. If the translocation steps of loaded and unloaded carrier are no longer rate limiting for the overall transport, electrical effects on the transport rate are bound to vanish as does the activation by co-transport.
在之前的一篇论文中,已经推导了通过同向转运进行继发性主动转运的动力学方程。在本文中,这些方程通过纳入电势差的影响进行了扩展,以便使其适用于由Na⁺或H⁺梯度驱动的更实际的继发性主动转运系统。从热力学角度来看,电势差作为驱动力可与等效的化学势差完全互换。但对于同向转运的动力学而言,情况未必如此。给定的驱动离子电化学活性差异主要是渗透的,即由于浓度差异,还是电的,即由于电化学活性系数差异,情况并不总是相同。在大多数情况下,浓度差异在驱动同向转运方面比导致相同电活性差异的等效电势差异更有效。后者的有效性高度取决于模型,无论是亲和型还是速度型,还取决于负载或空载载体是否带电荷。在相同的电势差下,如果三元复合物而不是空载载体带电,同向转运通常会更快。此外,总体转运的“标准参数”(见术语表,第62页)Jmax和Km,根据模型的不同,对引入电势差的反应也不同。因此,如果负载载体是离子型的,电势差大多会影响Km;如果空载载体是离子型的,电势差大多会影响Jmax,前提是负载载体的迁移率大于空载载体的迁移率。另一方面,亲和型和速度型模型之间的区别标准部分受到电势差的影响。如果负载和空载载体的转运步骤不再是总体转运的速率限制因素,那么对转运速率的电效应必然会消失,同向转运的激活作用也会消失。