Anderson F A, Wheeler H B, Goldberg R J, Hosmer D W, Forcier A, Patwardhan N A
Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Mar 28;154(6):669-77. doi: 10.1001/archinte.154.6.669.
To determine the effect of continuing medical education (CME) with and without a quality assurance component (CME+QA) on physician practices in the prevention of venous thromboembolism.
A communitywide study was performed in 15 short-stay hospitals in central Massachusetts. The study population included 3158 patients in acute-care hospitals with multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Study hospitals were randomly assigned to one of two educational strategies or to a control group that received no intervention.
The proportion of patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism who received effective methods of prophylaxis increased significantly from 29% in 1986 to 52% in 1989 (P < .001). This increase was seen in all study groups: control hospitals, 40% to 51% (P < .001); CME hospitals, 21% to 49% (P < .0001); and CME+QA hospitals, 27% to 55% (P < .0001). The increase in prophylaxis use from 1986 to 1989 was significantly greater among patients cared for in hospitals whose physicians participated in a formal CME program (an increase of 28%) than in control hospitals (an increase of 11%) (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the use of prophylaxis in hospitals whose physicians received CME+QA interventions compared with hospitals whose physicians received CME interventions alone (identical increases of 28%).
A formal CME program significantly increased the frequency with which physicians prescribed prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. We believe the key factor in our CME interventions that motivated clinicians to change their practices was the provision of hospital-specific data demonstrating a compelling need for improvement. Despite the substantial investment by hospitals in QA, traditional QA intervention appeared to provide no additional benefit. Even after extensive CME/QA interventions, prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism remained underutilized, suggesting the need to develop new approaches to changing clinical practice.
确定有无质量保证成分的继续医学教育(CME+QA)对医生预防静脉血栓栓塞实践的影响。
在马萨诸塞州中部的15家短期住院医院开展了一项全社区研究。研究人群包括3158例在急性护理医院中有多种静脉血栓栓塞风险因素的患者。研究医院被随机分配至两种教育策略之一或不接受干预的对照组。
接受有效预防方法的静脉血栓栓塞高危患者比例从1986年的29%显著增至1989年的52%(P<.001)。所有研究组均出现这种增长:对照组医院,从40%增至51%(P<.001);CME医院,从21%增至49%(P<.0001);CME+QA医院,从27%增至55%(P<.0001)。1986年至1989年,医生参与正式CME项目的医院中接受预防治疗的患者增加幅度(增加28%)显著大于对照组医院(增加11%)(P<.001)。与仅接受CME干预的医院相比,接受CME+QA干预的医院在预防治疗的使用上无显著差异(均增加28%)。
正式的CME项目显著提高了医生开具静脉血栓栓塞预防处方的频率。我们认为,在我们的CME干预中促使临床医生改变其做法的关键因素是提供了表明迫切需要改进的医院特定数据。尽管医院在质量保证方面投入巨大,但传统的质量保证干预似乎并未带来额外益处。即使经过广泛的CME/QA干预,静脉血栓栓塞的预防措施仍未得到充分利用,这表明需要开发改变临床实践的新方法。