Suppr超能文献

心水病的血清学诊断:五种检测方法的比较

The sero-diagnosis of heartwater: a comparison of five tests.

作者信息

Du Plessis J L, Bezuidenhout J D, Brett M S, Camus E, Jongejan F, Mahan S M, Martinez D

机构信息

Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Afrique du Sud.

出版信息

Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1993;46(1-2):123-9.

PMID:8134622
Abstract

Five serological tests, the indirect and competitive ELISA, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test with 2 different antigens and the Western blot technique were compared and applied to sera that were known to be either negative or positive against Cowdria ruminantium or that were collected from animals in heartwater-free regions. No false positive reactions were recorded with any of the tests against the known negative sera. Except for minor variations in the sensitivity of the 5 tests, there was good correlation between them. Their specificity, however, remains in dispute since in all 5 tests extensive cross-reactions were recorded with antibodies in response to an as yet unidentified agent, probably Ehrlichia.

摘要

对五种血清学检测方法进行了比较,包括间接和竞争酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、使用两种不同抗原的间接荧光抗体(IFA)检测以及蛋白质印迹技术,并将其应用于已知对反刍兽埃立克体呈阴性或阳性的血清,或从无牛心水病地区的动物采集的血清。针对已知阴性血清,所有检测均未记录到假阳性反应。除了这五种检测方法在敏感性上存在微小差异外,它们之间具有良好的相关性。然而,它们的特异性仍存在争议,因为在所有五种检测中,均记录到针对一种尚未明确的病原体(可能是埃立克体)产生抗体时出现广泛的交叉反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验