Schoenthaler R, Phillips T L, Castro J, Efird J T, Better A, Way L W
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Francisco.
Ann Surg. 1994 Mar;219(3):267-74. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199403000-00006.
The authors investigated the combined experience of a single institution in treating bile duct carcinoma during the modern era.
Bile duct carcinomas are notoriously difficult to cure, with locoregional recurrence the rule, even after radical resection. Adjuvant efforts have included various radiation modalities, with limited success. Recently, charged-particle radiotherapy has also been used in these patients.
The authors performed a retrospective chart analysis of 129 patients with bile duct adenocarcinomas treated between 1977 and 1987 through the University of California at San Francisco, including 22 patients treated at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory with the charged particles helium and neon. The minimum follow-up was 5 years. Survival, outcome, and complication results were analyzed.
Sixty-two patients were treated with surgery alone (S), 45 patients received conventional adjuvant x-ray radiotherapy (S + X), and 22 were treated with charged particles (S + CP). The median survival times were 6.5, 11, and 14 months, respectively, for the entire group, and 16, 16, and 23 months in patients treated with curative intent. There was a survival difference in patients undergoing total resection compared with debulking (p = 0.05) and minor resections (p = 0.0001). Patients with microscopic residual disease had increased median survival times when they were treated with adjuvant irradiation, most markedly after CP (p = 0.0005) but also with conventional X (p = 0.0109). Patients with gross residual disease had a less marked but still statistically significant extended survival (p = 0.05 for S + X and p = 0.0423 for S + CP) after irradiatio
The mainstay of bile duct carcinoma management was maximal surgical resection in these patients. Postoperative radiotherapy gave patients with positive microscopic margins a significant survival advantage and may be of value in selected patients with gross disease.
作者研究了一家机构在现代治疗胆管癌的综合经验。
胆管癌 notoriously难以治愈,即使在根治性切除后,局部区域复发也很常见。辅助治疗方法包括各种放疗方式,但效果有限。最近,带电粒子放疗也已应用于这些患者。
作者对1977年至1987年间在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校接受治疗的129例胆管腺癌患者进行了回顾性病历分析,其中22例在劳伦斯伯克利实验室接受了氦和氖带电粒子治疗。最短随访时间为5年。分析了生存情况、结局和并发症结果。
62例患者仅接受手术治疗(S),45例患者接受传统辅助X线放疗(S + X),22例患者接受带电粒子治疗(S + CP)。整个组的中位生存时间分别为6.5个月、11个月和14个月,而接受根治性治疗的患者分别为16个月、16个月和23个月。与减瘤手术(p = 0.05)和小范围切除(p = 0.0001)相比,接受根治性切除的患者存在生存差异。有镜下残留病灶的患者在接受辅助放疗时,中位生存时间延长,在接受CP治疗后最为明显(p = 0.0005),接受传统X线放疗时也有延长(p = 0.0109)。有肉眼残留病灶的患者在放疗后生存时间延长虽不明显但仍具有统计学意义(S + X组p = 0.05,S + CP组p = 0.0423)。
这些患者胆管癌治疗的主要方法是最大限度的手术切除。术后放疗使镜下切缘阳性的患者获得显著的生存优势,对部分有肉眼可见病灶的患者可能也有价值。