Verma Vivek, Lin Steven H, Simone Charles B, Mehta Minesh P
1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA ; 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Aug;7(4):644-64. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.05.06.
Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is frequently shown to be dosimetrically superior to photon radiotherapy (RT), though supporting data for clinical benefit are severely limited. Because of the potential for toxicity reduction in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, we systematically reviewed the literature on clinical outcomes (survival/toxicity) of PBT.
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group, and American Society of Clinical Oncology was conducted for publications from 2000-2015. Thirty-eight original investigations were analyzed.
Although results of PBT are not directly comparable to historical data, outcomes roughly mirror previous data, generally with reduced toxicities for PBT in some neoplasms. For esophageal cancer, PBT is associated with reduced toxicities, postoperative complications, and hospital stay as compared to photon radiation, while achieving comparable local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). In pancreatic cancer, numerical survival for resected/unresected cases is also similar to existing photon data, whereas grade ≥3 nausea/emesis and post-operative complications are numerically lower than those reported with photon RT. The strongest data in support of PBT for HCC comes from phase II trials demonstrating very low toxicities, and a phase III trial of PBT versus transarterial chemoembolization demonstrating trends towards improved LC and progression-free survival (PFS) with PBT, along with fewer post-treatment hospitalizations. Survival and toxicity data for cholangiocarcinoma, liver metastases, and retroperitoneal sarcoma are also roughly equivalent to historical photon controls. There are two small reports for gastric cancer and three for anorectal cancer; these are not addressed further.
Limited quality (and quantity) of data hamper direct comparisons and conclusions. However, the available data, despite the inherent caveats and limitations, suggest that PBT offers the potential to achieve significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities without compromising survival or LC for multiple GI malignancies. Several randomized comparative trials are underway that will provide more definitive answers.
质子束放疗(PBT)在剂量学上常显示优于光子放疗(RT),不过支持其临床获益的数据极为有限。鉴于胃肠道(GI)恶性肿瘤有降低毒性的潜力,我们系统回顾了关于PBT临床结局(生存/毒性)的文献。
对PubMed、EMBASE、美国放射肿瘤学会会议摘要、粒子治疗协作组以及美国临床肿瘤学会进行系统检索,查找2000年至2015年的出版物。分析了38项原始研究。
尽管PBT的结果无法直接与历史数据相比较,但结局大致反映了先前的数据,总体而言,PBT在某些肿瘤中的毒性有所降低。对于食管癌,与光子放疗相比,PBT可降低毒性、术后并发症及住院时间,同时实现相当的局部控制(LC)和总生存(OS)。在胰腺癌中,切除/未切除病例的生存数字也与现有的光子数据相似,而≥3级恶心/呕吐及术后并发症的数字低于光子RT报告的情况。支持PBT用于肝癌的最强数据来自II期试验,显示毒性极低,以及一项PBT与经动脉化疗栓塞的III期试验,表明PBT有改善LC和无进展生存(PFS)的趋势,且治疗后住院次数减少。胆管癌、肝转移瘤和腹膜后肉瘤的生存及毒性数据也大致与历史光子对照相当。有两篇关于胃癌的小报告和三篇关于肛管癌的报告;不再进一步讨论。
数据质量(和数量)有限妨碍了直接比较和得出结论。然而,现有数据尽管存在固有警示和局限性,但表明PBT有可能在不影响多种胃肠道恶性肿瘤生存或LC的情况下,显著降低治疗相关毒性。正在进行几项随机对照试验,将提供更明确的答案。