• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过土壤摄入确定慢性接触有害物质的标准]

[Criteria for the determination of chronic exposure to hazardous substances via soil ingestion].

作者信息

Konietzka R, Dieter H H

机构信息

Umweltbundesamt Berlin.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Jan;56(1):21-8.

PMID:8148583
Abstract

Legally recoverable protection of human health against pollutant effects must have for the enforcement in practice a technically comprehensible toxicological basis, i.e., a coherence or connection between the toxicological and legal definition of a dangerous situation must be found. For this purpose toxicological and socially accepted reference points in the unit "mg of pollutant amount absorbed per kg of weight per day" (mg/[kg of weight x d]) may be used to assess a danger in the sense a sufficient probability a damage to human health exists after exposure to certain pollutant concentrations. Based on the plausible toxicological assumption that above this reference point in case of an undisturbed course of action and by giving consideration to all exposure pathways a threshold of harmlessness including all groups of the population would be exceeded, criteria both for non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic substances or for substances suspected to cause cancer are being developed. These criteria allow to determine from which point the existence of a danger would be assessable as "sufficiently probable", and hence the required coherence between legal and toxicological view to be established.

摘要

从法律层面上可实现的对人类健康免受污染物影响的保护,在实际执行中必须有一个技术上易于理解的毒理学基础,也就是说,必须找到毒理学与危险情况的法律定义之间的连贯性或联系。为此,在“每天每千克体重吸收的污染物毫克数”(毫克/[千克体重×天])这一单位中,毒理学和社会认可的参考点可用于评估危险,即从某种意义上说,在接触某些污染物浓度后,存在对人类健康造成损害的足够可能性。基于合理的毒理学假设,即在这种行动不受干扰的情况下,若超过此参考点,并考虑到所有接触途径,包括所有人群组的无害阈值将会被突破,正在制定非致癌物质和致癌物质或疑似致癌物质的标准。这些标准能够确定从哪一点开始,危险的存在可被评估为“足够可能”,从而建立起法律观点与毒理学观点之间所需的连贯性。

相似文献

1
[Criteria for the determination of chronic exposure to hazardous substances via soil ingestion].[通过土壤摄入确定慢性接触有害物质的标准]
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Jan;56(1):21-8.
2
[Public health evaluation of (hazardous) substances in soil--concept of the AGU and Department of "Tolerable (Hazardous) Substance Concentrations in Soil" for metals].
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 May;56(5):253-62.
3
Which multiple of a safe body dose derived on the basis of default factors would probably be unsafe?基于默认因素得出的安全人体剂量的多少倍可能是不安全的?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Dec;22(3):262-7. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1995.0008.
4
[Toxicologic risk assessment and prevention: rational and irrational approaches].
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996 Dec;199(2-4):227-39.
5
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
6
Toxicological comments to the discussion about REACH.关于《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH)讨论的毒理学评论
Arch Toxicol. 2006 Mar;80(3):121-4. doi: 10.1007/s00204-005-0039-z. Epub 2006 Jan 13.
7
Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).每日允许摄入量(或暂定每日摄入量或每日耐受摄入量)估计值的精确度。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1331.
8
[Public health relevant levels of pollutants in soil. Considerations for preventive, environmental health protection].[土壤中与公共卫生相关的污染物水平。预防和环境保护的考量]
Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Jul;60(7):439-44.
9
[Adverse effects as a human toxicological problem].
Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg. 1999;103:108-38.
10
[Waste burdens--hazardous paths, aims of protection, environmental-toxicological assessment].[废物负担——危险路径、保护目标、环境毒理学评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Feb;54(2):81-7.