Hofstee D J, Neef C, van Laar T, Jansen E N
Department of Neurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994 Feb;17(1):45-52.
In this study, we measured the relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) apomorphine levels and their clinical effects in two patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). After subcutaneous injection of apomorphine, serial samples of plasma and lumbal CSF were taken and serial scoring of motor responses was done using the Webster Rating Scale. The ratio of the highest level of apomorphine in CSF and plasma was 0.036 for patient A and 0.025 for patient B. The time lag between the highest level of apomorphine in plasma and CSF was 20 min for patient A and 10 min for patient B. Plasma levels of apomorphine correlated weakly with clinical motor responses. However, we could establish a highly strong correlation between apomorphine CSF levels and clinical motor responses: 0.93 and 0.89 for patients A and B, respectively. We conclude that a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model explains the clinical effects of apomorphine better than does a one-compartment model. In a two-compartment model, clinical effect can clearly be correlated to apomorphine levels in the central compartment.
在本研究中,我们测量了两名帕金森病(PD)患者血浆和脑脊液(CSF)中阿扑吗啡水平之间的关系及其临床效果。皮下注射阿扑吗啡后,采集血浆和腰段脑脊液的系列样本,并使用韦伯斯特评定量表对运动反应进行系列评分。患者A脑脊液与血浆中阿扑吗啡最高水平的比值为0.036,患者B为0.025。患者A血浆和脑脊液中阿扑吗啡最高水平之间的时间间隔为20分钟,患者B为10分钟。阿扑吗啡的血浆水平与临床运动反应的相关性较弱。然而,我们发现阿扑吗啡脑脊液水平与临床运动反应之间存在高度显著的相关性:患者A和患者B分别为0.93和0.89。我们得出结论,二室药代动力学模型比一室模型能更好地解释阿扑吗啡的临床效果。在二室模型中,临床效果可明显与中央室中的阿扑吗啡水平相关。