• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理领域的专家系统开发:对重症护理实践的启示

Expert system development in nursing: implications for critical care nursing practice.

作者信息

Fonteyn M E, Grobe S J

机构信息

University of San Francisco, School of Nursing, CA 94117-1080.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 1994 Jan-Feb;23(1):80-7.

PMID:8150649
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To obtain information about how highly experienced critical care nurses reason to plan care and make decisions about a critically ill unstable patient, and to determine the usefulness of this information for expert system development.

DESIGN

Descriptive, using think-aloud technique and protocol analysis.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENT

A simulated patient case whose condition deteriorated over a 12-hour shift. The case depicted an elderly female with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response.

RESULTS

Protocol analysis revealed the information (data) that subjects used and how they structured that information to plan care and make decisions. Examination of subjects' reasoning processes allowed the investigators to identify "if-then" rules that could be used in expert system design.

CONCLUSIONS

The reasoning processes identified would assist in expert system development. An expert system designed to represent experienced critical care nurses' knowledge and reasoning processes would preserve that expertise in a computer system that could then be used to assist less experienced nurses to improve their reasoning skills and strategies.

摘要

目的

获取关于经验丰富的重症监护护士如何进行推理以规划护理并对病情不稳定的重症患者做出决策的信息,并确定该信息对专家系统开发的有用性。

设计

采用出声思考技术和协议分析的描述性研究。

地点

实验室。

患者

一个模拟患者案例,其病情在12小时的轮班期间恶化。该案例描述的是一位患有充血性心力衰竭和伴有快速心室反应的心房颤动的老年女性。

结果

协议分析揭示了受试者使用的信息(数据)以及他们如何组织这些信息来规划护理和做出决策。对受试者推理过程的检查使研究人员能够识别可用于专家系统设计的“如果-那么”规则。

结论

所识别的推理过程将有助于专家系统的开发。一个旨在体现经验丰富的重症监护护士的知识和推理过程的专家系统,将把该专业知识保存在一个计算机系统中,然后可用于帮助经验不足的护士提高其推理技能和策略。

相似文献

1
Expert system development in nursing: implications for critical care nursing practice.护理领域的专家系统开发:对重症护理实践的启示
Heart Lung. 1994 Jan-Feb;23(1):80-7.
2
How do children's nurses make clinical decisions? Two preliminary studies.儿童护士如何做出临床决策?两项初步研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1324-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01453.x.
3
Nurses' reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study.以预防压疮为例探讨护士在护理计划制定过程中的推理过程。一项有声思维研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
4
An exploration of an innovative methodological approach for examining nurses' heuristic use in clinical practice.一种用于检验护士在临床实践中启发式方法运用的创新方法论途径的探索。
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1995 Fall;9(3):263-76; discussion 277-9.
5
A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: verbal protocol analysis.新手护士与专家护士在临床决策过程中线索收集的比较:口头报告分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
6
Critical care nurses' decision making: sedation assessment and management in intensive care.重症监护护士的决策:重症监护中的镇静评估与管理
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jan;18(1):36-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02318.x. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
7
Expert nurses' clinical reasoning under uncertainty: representation, structure, and process.经验丰富的护士在不确定性下的临床推理:表征、结构与过程。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:405-9.
8
Clinical decision making by nurses when faced with third-space fluid shift. How well do they fare?护士在面对第三间隙液体转移时的临床决策。他们的表现如何?
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug;24(4):182-91.
9
Haemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery: nurses' perceptions of clinical decision-making.心脏手术后的血流动力学不稳定:护士对临床决策的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Sep;15(9):1081-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01392.x.
10
Thinking in nursing practice.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;46:305-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection.了解药剂师在检测药物不良事件(ADE)时的决策过程。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Apr;15(2):266-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00992.x.