Suppr超能文献

记忆障碍的某些方面清楚地将阿尔茨海默病型痴呆与抑郁性假性痴呆区分开来。

Some aspects of memory disorders clearly distinguish dementia of the Alzheimer's type from depressive pseudo-dementia.

作者信息

Gainotti G, Marra C

机构信息

Neuropsychology Service, Catholic University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Feb;16(1):65-78. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402617.

Abstract

Two groups of patients affected by mild dementia of the Alzheimer's type (n = 42) or by depressive pseudo-dementia (n = 26) were given a modified version of the Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test. The two groups were roughly matched for overall level of cognitive impairment. The main purpose of the research was to determine if some aspects of their memory disorders distinguished the two diagnostic groups. Comparison between results obtained on recall and on recognition measures was of little diagnostic usefulness in distinguishing dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) from depressive pseudo-dementia (DPD). A marked prevalence of the recency over the primary effect in immediate recall, a high rate of forgetting, and the presence of many intrusion errors on delayed recall were observed more frequently in DAT than in DPD patients. None of these indices, however, was sensitive and specific enough to allow a confident diagnostic discrimination at the individual case level. The memory measure which best distinguished DAT from DPD patients was the presence of several false positive errors on delayed recognition because DAT patients adopted a very liberal response bias, endorsing many false recognition errors, whereas DPD patients adopted a conservative criterion and tended to miss real stimuli, rather than making false recognition errors.

摘要

两组患者,一组患有轻度阿尔茨海默型痴呆(n = 42),另一组患有抑郁性假性痴呆(n = 26),他们接受了改良版的雷伊听觉词语学习测验。两组在认知障碍的总体水平上大致匹配。该研究的主要目的是确定其记忆障碍的某些方面是否能区分这两个诊断组。在区分阿尔茨海默型痴呆(DAT)和抑郁性假性痴呆(DPD)方面,回忆和识别测量结果之间的比较几乎没有诊断价值。与DPD患者相比,DAT患者在即时回忆中近因效应明显高于首因效应,遗忘率高,且在延迟回忆中存在许多侵入性错误。然而,这些指标中没有一个足够敏感和特异,无法在个体病例水平上进行可靠的诊断区分。区分DAT患者和DPD患者的最佳记忆测量指标是在延迟识别中存在多个假阳性错误,因为DAT患者采用了非常宽松的反应偏差,认可许多错误的识别,而DPD患者采用了保守的标准,倾向于错过真实刺激,而不是做出错误的识别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验