Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;27(2):125-35. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr104. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
The serial position effect shows that two interrelated cognitive processes underlie immediate recall of a supraspan word list. The current study used item response theory (IRT) methods to determine whether the serial position effect poses a threat to the construct validity of immediate list recall as a measure of verbal episodic memory. Archival data were obtained from a national sample of 4,212 volunteers aged 28-84 in the Midlife Development in the United States study. Telephone assessment yielded item-level data for a single immediate recall trial of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Two parameter logistic IRT procedures were used to estimate item parameters and the Q(1) statistic was used to evaluate item fit. A two-dimensional model better fit the data than a unidimensional model, supporting the notion that list recall is influenced by two underlying cognitive processes. IRT analyses revealed that 4 of the 15 RAVLT items (1, 12, 14, and 15) were misfit (p < .05). Item characteristic curves for items 14 and 15 decreased monotonically, implying an inverse relationship between the ability level and the probability of recall. Elimination of the four misfit items provided better fit to the data and met necessary IRT assumptions. Performance on a supraspan list learning test is influenced by multiple cognitive abilities; failure to account for the serial position of words decreases the construct validity of the test as a measure of episodic memory and may provide misleading results. IRT methods can ameliorate these problems and improve construct validity.
系列位置效应表明,两个相互关联的认知过程是即时回忆超长单词表的基础。本研究使用项目反应理论(IRT)方法来确定系列位置效应是否对即时列表回忆作为口头情节记忆的衡量标准的结构有效性构成威胁。存档数据来自美国中年发展研究中的 4212 名年龄在 28 至 84 岁的志愿者的全国样本。电话评估得出了 Rey 听觉言语学习测试(RAVLT)的单次即时回忆试验的项目级数据。使用二维逻辑斯蒂项目反应理论程序来估计项目参数,并用 Q(1)统计量来评估项目拟合度。二维模型比一维模型更能拟合数据,这支持了列表回忆受两个潜在认知过程影响的观点。IRT 分析显示,15 个 RAVLT 项目中的 4 个(1、12、14 和 15)拟合不良(p<.05)。项目 14 和 15 的项目特征曲线单调下降,这意味着能力水平和回忆概率之间存在反比关系。删除这四个拟合不良的项目可以更好地拟合数据,并满足必要的 IRT 假设。超长列表学习测试的表现受到多种认知能力的影响;未能考虑单词的序列位置会降低测试作为情节记忆衡量标准的结构有效性,并可能提供误导性结果。IRT 方法可以改善这些问题并提高结构有效性。