Suppr超能文献

[评估颈动脉狭窄手术的临床试验结果]

[Results of clinical trials evaluating the surgery of carotid stenoses].

作者信息

Leys D

机构信息

Service de neurologie B, hôpital B, Lille.

出版信息

Rev Prat. 1993 Dec 1;43(19):2493-7.

PMID:8153531
Abstract

The usefulness of carotid endarterectomy remained unsettled until 1991, although it was one of the most widespread surgical interventions. Its indications are now being scientifically established by means of perspective and randomized clinical trials comparing endarterectomy to medical therapy in patients with internal carotid artery atherosclerosis. The results of 2 trials (CASANOVA, VACS#167) performed in asymptomatic patients suggest that there is no evidence that carotid endarterectomy might be of benefit in such patients; however both studies had serious methodological problems that will probably be resolved by a large on-going study (ACAS). The results of 3 trials performed in patients with recent transient ischemic attacks or stroke in the internal carotid artery territory suggest that: (1) carotid endarterectomy is of benefit in patients with a degree of stenosis higher than 70%; (2) carotid endarterectomy is not of benefit in patients with a degree of stenosis smaller than 30%; (3) the best therapeutic strategy remains unsettled in patients with a 30-70% degree of stenosis and in patients examined more than 6 months after neurological deficits.

摘要

颈动脉内膜切除术尽管是应用最为广泛的外科手术之一,但其效用直到1991年仍未确定。目前,通过前瞻性随机临床试验,将内膜切除术与内科治疗用于颈内动脉粥样硬化患者进行对比,从而科学地确定其适应证。在无症状患者中开展的两项试验(CASANOVA、VACS#167)结果表明,没有证据显示颈动脉内膜切除术对这类患者有益;然而,两项研究均存在严重的方法学问题,可能会被正在进行的一项大型研究(ACAS)解决。在近期发生过短暂性脑缺血发作或颈内动脉供血区中风的患者中开展的三项试验结果表明:(1)对于狭窄程度高于70%的患者,颈动脉内膜切除术有益;(2)对于狭窄程度低于30%的患者,颈动脉内膜切除术无益;(3)对于狭窄程度在30%-70%的患者以及神经功能缺损发生超过6个月后接受检查的患者,最佳治疗策略仍未确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验