Durack D T, Lukes A S, Bright D K
Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Am J Med. 1994 Mar;96(3):200-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90143-0.
This study was designed to develop improved criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis and to compare these criteria with currently accepted criteria in a large series of cases.
A total of 405 consecutive cases of suspected infective endocarditis in 353 patients evaluated in a tertiary care hospital from 1985 to 1992 were analyzed using new diagnostic criteria for endocarditis. We defined two "major criteria" (typical blood culture and positive echocardiogram) and six "minor criteria" (predisposition, fever, vascular phenomena, immunologic phenomena, suggestive echocardiogram, and suggestive microbiologic findings). We also defined three diagnostic categories: (1) "definite" by pathologic or clinical criteria, (2) "possible," and (3) "rejected." Each suspected case of endocarditis was classified using both old and new criteria. Sixty-nine pathologically proven cases were reclassified after exclusion of the surgical or autopsy findings, enabling comparison of clinical diagnostic criteria in proven cases.
Fifty-five (80%) of the 69 pathologically confirmed cases were classified as clinically definite endocarditis. The older criteria classified only 35 (51%) of the 69 pathologically confirmed cases into the analogous probable category (p < 0.0001). Twelve (17%) pathologically confirmed cases were rejected by older clinical criteria, but none were rejected by the new criteria. Seventy-one (21%) of the remaining 336 cases that were not proven pathologically were probable by older criteria, whereas the new criteria almost doubled the number of definite cases, to 135 (40%, p < 0.01). Of the 150 cases rejected by older criteria, 11 were definite, 87 were possible, and 52 were rejected by the new criteria.
Application of the proposed new criteria increases the number of definite diagnoses. This should be useful for more accurate diagnosis and classification of patients with suspected endocarditis and provide better entry criteria for epidemiologic studies and clinical trials.
本研究旨在制定改进的感染性心内膜炎诊断标准,并在大量病例中与目前公认的标准进行比较。
采用新的心内膜炎诊断标准,对1985年至1992年在一家三级护理医院评估的353例患者中连续出现的405例疑似感染性心内膜炎病例进行分析。我们定义了两个“主要标准”(典型血培养和超声心动图阳性)和六个“次要标准”(易患因素、发热、血管现象、免疫现象、提示性超声心动图和提示性微生物学发现)。我们还定义了三个诊断类别:(1)根据病理或临床标准为“确诊”,(2)“可能”,(3)“排除”。每例疑似心内膜炎病例均使用新旧标准进行分类。排除手术或尸检结果后,对69例经病理证实的病例进行重新分类,以便比较确诊病例的临床诊断标准。
69例经病理证实的病例中,55例(80%)被分类为临床确诊的心内膜炎。旧标准仅将69例经病理证实的病例中的35例(51%)分类为类似的“很可能”类别(p<0.0001)。12例(17%)经病理证实的病例被旧临床标准排除,但新标准无一例排除。其余336例未经病理证实的病例中,71例(21%)根据旧标准为“很可能”,而新标准使确诊病例数几乎增加了一倍,达到135例(40%,p<0.01)。在被旧标准排除的150例病例中,11例为确诊,87例为可能,52例被新标准排除。
应用所提出的新标准增加了确诊诊断的数量。这对于更准确地诊断和分类疑似心内膜炎患者应是有用的,并为流行病学研究和临床试验提供更好的入选标准。