Del Pont J M, De Cicco L T, Vartalitis C, Ithurralde M, Gallo J P, Vargas F, Gianantonio C A, Quirós R E
Section of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Dec;14(12):1079-86.
A new diagnostic schema for infective endocarditis (IE), the Duke criteria, has been compared with the previously published criteria of von Reyn in adult patients. This study was designed to analyze the clinical characteristics of a group of pediatric patients with IE and to compare the diagnostic efficiency of both sets of criteria. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical records of 38 patients, 22 with predisposing heart disease (Subgroup A) and 16 with no known cardiologic abnormality (Subgroup B). Ventricular septal defect was the most frequent preexisting heart disease (31.8%) and central venous catheters were the most frequent predisposing factor (68.7%). Comparison of the clinical features between subgroups (A vs. B) showed differences only for the presence of a new regurgitant murmur (9% vs. 44%, P < 0.05) and a hemoglobin value < or = 10 g/dl (50% vs. 94%, P < 0.05). The most frequent microorganisms isolated were viridans streptococci (36%) in Subgroup A and Staphylococcus aureus (50%) in Subgroup B. Of the 6 pathologically confirmed cases all would have been classified as clinically definite by the Duke criteria, as compared with 2 of 6 being defined as probable and one being rejected by von Reyn criteria. Of the 32 cases clinically defined 19 (59%) were classified as definite by the Duke criteria, and 11 (34%) were probable by the von Reyn criteria (difference 25%, P < 0.01). Although no case of IE was rejected by Duke criteria, 8 (25%) were rejected by von Reyn criteria (difference 25%, P < 0.01), with all 8 classified as possible by Duke criteria. We conclude that the Duke criteria were superior to the von Reyn criteria for the diagnosis of pediatric IE, including more cases as definite and significantly fewer cases as rejected.
一种用于感染性心内膜炎(IE)的新诊断方案——杜克标准,已与先前发表的冯·雷诺(von Reyn)标准在成年患者中进行了比较。本研究旨在分析一组小儿感染性心内膜炎患者的临床特征,并比较这两套标准的诊断效率。我们回顾性分析了38例患者的临床记录,其中22例有易患心脏病(A组),16例无已知心脏异常(B组)。室间隔缺损是最常见的原有心脏病(31.8%),中心静脉导管是最常见的易患因素(68.7%)。两组(A组与B组)临床特征比较显示,仅在出现新的反流性杂音方面存在差异(9%对44%,P<0.05)以及血红蛋白值≤10 g/dl方面存在差异(50%对94%,P<0.05)。A组分离出的最常见微生物是草绿色链球菌(36%),B组是金黄色葡萄球菌(50%)。在6例经病理证实的病例中,根据杜克标准所有病例均可归类为临床确诊,相比之下,根据冯·雷诺标准6例中有2例被定义为可能,1例被排除。在32例临床确诊的病例中,19例(59%)根据杜克标准被归类为确诊,11例(34%)根据冯·雷诺标准为可能(差异25%,P<0.01)。虽然没有病例被杜克标准排除,但有8例(25%)被冯·雷诺标准排除(差异25%,P<0.01),这8例根据杜克标准均被归类为可能。我们得出结论,在小儿感染性心内膜炎的诊断中,杜克标准优于冯·雷诺标准,包括确诊病例更多,被排除病例显著更少。