Suppr超能文献

通过加速度肌电图监测神经肌肉阻滞:Mini-Accelograph与Myograph 2000的比较。

Monitoring neuromuscular block by acceleromyography: comparison of the Mini-Accelograph with the Myograph 2000.

作者信息

Harper N J, Martlew R, Strang T, Wallace M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1994 Apr;72(4):411-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.4.411.

Abstract

The precision of the compact Mini-Accelograph (M-A) was compared with the Myograph 2000 (MYO). Neuromuscular block resulting from atracurium was measured simultaneously by the MYO and the M-A applied to contralateral thumbs. During onset, the M-A frequently underestimated the extent of block (maximal at approximately 50% twitch depression). The M-A control train-of-four (TOF) ratio was characteristically > 1.0 and remained greater than the MYO ratio during the onset of atracurium. During recovery, the difference between the MYO and the M-A was maximal at approximately 50% twitch depression, but the M-A frequently overestimated the extent of block. The mean differences between the MYO and the M-A were small in respect of the recovery index (RI) and the TOF. However, the limits of agreement were unacceptably wide for both TOF and RI. When the MYO TOF was 0.7, the corresponding M-A TOF varied between 0.4 and 1.0. The M-A was more susceptible to drift than the MYO.

摘要

将紧凑型迷你加速度计(M-A)的精度与肌动描记器2000(MYO)进行了比较。将MYO和M-A分别应用于对侧拇指,同时测量阿曲库铵引起的神经肌肉阻滞。在起效过程中,M-A经常低估阻滞程度(最大约为50%的颤搐抑制)。M-A的控制四个成串刺激(TOF)比值通常>1.0,且在阿曲库铵起效过程中一直大于MYO的比值。在恢复过程中,MYO和M-A之间的差异在约50%的颤搐抑制时最大,但M-A经常高估阻滞程度。就恢复指数(RI)和TOF而言,MYO和M-A之间的平均差异较小。然而,TOF和RI的一致性界限都宽得令人无法接受。当MYO的TOF为0.7时,相应的M-A的TOF在0.4至1.0之间变化。M-A比MYO更容易受到漂移的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验