Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01000-w. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
Accuracy of acceleromyography (AMG) is not be comparable to that of mechanomyography or electromyography (EMG). In particular, the prone position may reduce the accuracy and feasibility of AMG. We developed a new device based on wrist brace to allow free thumb movement and fix the other parts of the hand and wrist. We aimed to test whether the brace applied to the AMG would increase precision of AMG and agreement with the EMG in the prone position. Fifty-seven patients, undergoing lumbar surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to groups to which AMG was applied with or without (no) brace (29 in group B vs. 28 in group NB). EMG was performed in the contralateral arm. Repeatability coefficients of the first twitch height (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) ratio were assessed from nine consecutive measurements during spontaneous recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block and the AMGs of the two groups were compared in prone position. The agreement between AMG and EMG in each group was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. In group B, the repeatability coefficient of T1 was significantly lower during the recovery to T1 of 25% and TOF ratio of 0.9 (P = 0.017 and 0.033, respectively), indicating higher precision. The mean differences of bias (95% limits of agreement) between AMG and EMG in TOF ratio of 0.9 were 6.839 (- 26.54 to 40.22) in group NB and 3.922 (- 21.83 to 29.67) in group B. The wide limits of agreement in group NB was slightly narrowed in group B but without significance. Trial registration: registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry in August 2020 (UMIN000041310).
肌动描记法(AMG)的准确性无法与肌电图(EMG)相比。特别是,仰卧位可能会降低 AMG 的准确性和可行性。我们开发了一种基于手腕夹板的新设备,允许拇指自由移动,并固定手部和手腕的其他部分。我们旨在测试在仰卧位时,夹板应用于 AMG 是否会提高 AMG 的精度并与 EMG 相吻合。
57 名接受全身麻醉下腰椎手术的患者被随机分为两组,分别为 AMG 加(B 组)或不加(NB 组)夹板组。对另一侧手臂进行 EMG 测量。在罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞自发恢复过程中,从 9 次连续测量中评估第一次颤搐高度(T1)和强直刺激四个成串反应(TOF)比值的重复性系数,并比较两组的 AMG。使用 Bland-Altman 方法评估每组 AMG 和 EMG 之间的一致性。在 B 组中,在恢复至 T1 为 25%和 TOF 比值为 0.9 时,T1 的重复性系数显著降低(分别为 P=0.017 和 0.033),表明精度更高。在 TOF 比值为 0.9 时,NB 组和 B 组 AMG 和 EMG 之间的平均差异(95%一致性区间)分别为 6.839(-26.54 至 40.22)和 3.922(-21.83 至 29.67)。NB 组的一致性区间较宽,在 B 组略有缩小,但无统计学意义。
2020 年 8 月在 UMIN 临床试验注册中心注册(UMIN000041310)。