Kaizer L, Warr D, Hoskins P, Latreille J, Lofters W, Yau J, Palmer M, Zee B, Levy M, Pater J
Department of Medicine, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga; Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 May;12(5):1050-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.5.1050.
This study examines whether the schedule of ondansetron significantly influences its antiemetic efficacy in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, whether the administration of oral ondansetron after 24 hours is effective in preventing delayed emesis, and whether the efficacy of ondansetron is preserved over multiple courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
A multicenter double-blind study randomized 302 cancer patients to one of three treatment arms. Arm A received dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Canada Inc, Toronto, Canada) 8 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally every 12 hours postchemotherapy for nine doses. Arm B received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 16 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus placebo orally postchemotherapy in the same schedule as arm A. Arm C received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 8 mg prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally postchemotherapy for one dose followed by placebo orally every 12 hours for eight more doses. Response was assessed by the number of reported episodes of vomiting and by severity of nausea measured on a visual analog scale (VAS).
The two schedules of ondansetron used in the first 24 hours were no different in their antiemetic efficacy, with similar rates for complete responses (76.7% v 72.0%, P = .472), complete plus major responses (90.2% v 82.0%, P = .135), and severity of nausea (P = .348). Oral ondansetron after 24 hours was more effective than placebo in preventing delayed nausea and emesis, with superior rates of complete responses (59.6% v 42.1%, P = .012 by one-sided test), complete plus major responses (80.9% v 66.3%, P = .018 by one-sided test), and less severe nausea (9.2 mm v 18.6 mm on a 100-mm VAS, P = .002). The efficacy of ondansetron was maintained over subsequent courses of chemotherapy.
The schedule of ondansetron in the first 24 hours does not influence its efficacy. The use of oral maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed nausea and emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
本研究旨在探讨昂丹司琼的给药方案是否会显著影响其在化疗后首24小时内的止吐疗效,24小时后口服昂丹司琼对预防延迟性呕吐是否有效,以及在多疗程中度致吐性化疗中昂丹司琼的疗效是否能得以维持。
一项多中心双盲研究将302例癌症患者随机分为三个治疗组之一。A组在化疗前静脉注射10 mg地塞米松加静脉注射8 mg昂丹司琼(枢复宁;葛兰素加拿大公司,多伦多,加拿大),化疗后每12小时口服8 mg昂丹司琼,共九剂。B组在化疗前静脉注射10 mg地塞米松加静脉注射16 mg昂丹司琼,化疗后口服安慰剂,给药方案与A组相同。C组在化疗前静脉注射10 mg地塞米松加8 mg昂丹司琼,化疗后口服1剂8 mg昂丹司琼,随后每12小时口服安慰剂,共八剂。通过报告的呕吐发作次数以及用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的恶心严重程度来评估反应。
在首24小时内使用的两种昂丹司琼给药方案的止吐疗效无差异,完全缓解率(76.7%对72.0%,P = 0.472)、完全缓解加主要缓解率(90.2%对82.0%,P = 0.135)以及恶心严重程度(P = 0.348)相似。24小时后口服昂丹司琼在预防延迟性恶心和呕吐方面比安慰剂更有效,完全缓解率更高(59.6%对42.1%,单侧检验P = 0.012)、完全缓解加主要缓解率更高(80.9%对66.3%,单侧检验P = 0.018),且恶心程度较轻(在100 mm VAS上为9.2 mm对18.6 mm,P = 0.002)。昂丹司琼的疗效在后续化疗疗程中得以维持。
首24小时内昂丹司琼的给药方案不影响其疗效。口服维持使用昂丹司琼对预防中度致吐性化疗后的延迟性恶心和呕吐有效。