Lofters W S, Pater J L, Zee B, Dempsey E, Walde D, Moquin J P, Wilson K, Hoskins P, Guevin R M, Verma S, Navari R, Krook J E, Hainsworth J, Palmer M, Chin C
Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Ontario.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Aug;15(8):2966-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.8.2966.
To compare the efficacy of dolasetron and ondansetron in controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours; to evaluate the efficacy when dexamethasone is added to either drug in the first 24 hours; and to extend these comparisons over 7 days in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study with six parallel arms that used a 2 x 2 factorial design in chemotherapy-naive patients. In arm 1, dolasetron (2.4 mg/kg) was given intravenously (I.V.) prechemotherapy, followed 24 hours later by oral dolasetron (200 mg once daily) for 6 days. Arms 2 and 3 consisted of dolasetron and dexamethasone 8 mg I.V., followed 24 hours later by oral dexamethasone (8 mg once daily) in one arm, and oral dexamethasone and dolasetron in the other, also for 6 days. In arms 4, 5, and 6, ondansetron (32 mg I.V. or 8 mg orally twice daily) was administered in a similar manner to arms 1, 2, and 3 before and 24 hours after chemotherapy. Mean nausea severity (MNS) was assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) in a daily diary.
Of 703 patients enrolled, 696 were eligible. There were 343 dolasetron- and 353 ondansetron-treated patients; 57% of dolasetron-treated patients had complete protection in the first 24 hours versus 67% of patients who received ondansetron (P = .013). MNS was also more pronounced on the dolasetron arm (P = .051). Sixty-seven percent of patients who received added dexamethasone in the first 24 hours had complete protection, compared with 55% without dexamethasone (P < .001). MNS was significantly reduced with the addition of dexamethasone (P < .001). At 7 days, dolasetron and ondansetron had equivalent complete protection rates (36% and 39%, respectively). With the addition of dexamethasone, 48% of patients compared with 28% had complete protection (P < .001). MNS was significantly improved with added dexamethasone (P < .001).
At the doses used, dolasetron was significantly less effective than ondansetron at controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, but there was no demonstrable difference between both drugs over 7 days. The addition of dexamethasone significantly improved the efficacy of both drugs in the first 24 hours and over 7 days.
比较多潘立酮和昂丹司琼在前24小时控制恶心和呕吐的疗效;评估在最初24小时将地塞米松添加到这两种药物中的疗效;并在接受中度致吐性化疗的患者中进行7天的疗效比较。
这是一项多中心、双盲、随机研究,采用2×2析因设计,纳入初治化疗患者,分6个平行组。第1组在化疗前静脉注射多潘立酮(2.4mg/kg),24小时后口服多潘立酮(200mg,每日1次),共6天。第2组和第3组,一组先静脉注射多潘立酮和8mg地塞米松,24小时后口服地塞米松(8mg,每日1次),另一组先口服地塞米松和多潘立酮,均为6天。第4、5、6组,化疗前及化疗后24小时,以类似第1、2、3组的方式给予昂丹司琼(静脉注射32mg或口服8mg,每日2次)。通过每日日记,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估平均恶心严重程度(MNS)。
703例入组患者中,696例符合条件。多潘立酮治疗组343例,昂丹司琼治疗组353例;多潘立酮治疗组57%的患者在前24小时获得完全保护,而接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者为67%(P = 0.013)。多潘立酮组的MNS也更明显(P = 0.051)。在前24小时接受地塞米松的患者中,67%获得完全保护,未接受地塞米松的患者为55%(P < 0.001)。添加地塞米松后MNS显著降低(P < 0.001)。在第7天,多潘立酮和昂丹司琼的完全保护率相当(分别为36%和39%)。添加地塞米松后,48%的患者获得完全保护,未添加地塞米松的为28%(P < 0.001)。添加地塞米松后MNS显著改善(P < 0.001)。
在使用的剂量下,多潘立酮在控制接受中度致吐性化疗患者的前24小时恶心和呕吐方面明显不如昂丹司琼有效,但在7天内两种药物之间没有明显差异。添加地塞米松显著提高了两种药物在前24小时和7天内的疗效。