Suppr超能文献

外科内镜 fellowship 培训项目。它们有何不同?

Surgical endoscopy fellowships. What difference do they make?

作者信息

Mellinger J D, Ponsky J L

机构信息

Department of Surgery/SGHS, USAF Medical Center Wright Patterson, OH 45433.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1994 Feb;8(2):86-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00316615.

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the career impact of a formalized surgical endoscopy fellowship. Sixteen surgeons who have completed this training were surveyed via questionnaire. Twelve individuals were found to be in teaching settings, 10 had academic appointments, and 12 had published in the endoscopic and gastrointestinal literature. Gastrointestinal endoscopy constituted a mean of 28% of these surgeons' practices. Gastrointestinal surgery was the focus of a mean of 51% of their operative experience, and laparoscopic surgery constituted a mean of 40% of their surgical activity. Twelve of these individuals performed ERCP as part of their clinical practice, and 11 performed advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures. Relationships with nonsurgical endoscopic colleagues were considered positive for 5 surgeons, negative for 7, and neutral for 4. Professional relationships with nongastroenterologic physicians were uniformly positive or neutral. We conclude that formal surgical endoscopy fellowships facilitate subsequent academic and educational activity, foster surgical practices oriented toward gastrointestinal disease, and impact relationships with nonsurgical colleagues in a variable fashion.

摘要

本研究旨在评估正规外科内镜专科培训对职业发展的影响。通过问卷调查了16名完成该培训的外科医生。发现其中12人在教学机构工作,10人有学术职务,12人在内镜及胃肠病学领域发表过文章。胃肠内镜检查平均占这些外科医生业务的28%。胃肠外科平均占他们手术经验的51%,腹腔镜手术平均占他们手术活动的40%。其中12人在临床实践中开展内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),11人进行高级腹腔镜手术。5名外科医生认为与非手术内镜同事的关系良好,7名认为关系不佳,4名认为关系一般。与非胃肠病学医生的专业关系均为良好或一般。我们得出结论,正规的外科内镜专科培训有助于后续的学术和教育活动,促进针对胃肠疾病的外科实践,并以不同方式影响与非手术同事的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验