Olson E M, Healy J F, Wong W H, Youmans D C, Hesselink J R
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center 92103-8756.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 May;162(5):1199-204. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.5.8166010.
Although fast spin-echo images and slower spin-echo images have similar contrast characteristics, the two techniques have not yet been shown to be equivalent in all aspects of brain imaging. To determine if the two sequences are equivalent, we compared detection of white matter lesions, image quality, and artifact degradation on fast spin-echo and spin-echo proton density-weighted and T2-weighted MR images of the brain in prospectively selected patients who were seropositive for HIV.
Fast spin-echo and spin-echo MR images of the brain were obtained in 153 consecutive subjects. The images were reviewed independently by three experienced neuroradiologists. The size, number, and location of white matter lesions were compared for the two techniques. Image quality, motion artifact, CSF flow artifact, and gray-white matter differentiation were graded on a five-point scale.
No statistical difference was found in gray-white matter differentiation. Overall image quality, CSF flow artifacts, and motion artifacts were slightly worse on the fast spin-echo images (p < .05). Although some variability existed in the detection of lesions less than 5 mm in diameter, the differences was small, and all larger lesions were detected by both techniques. Agreement between fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo techniques was nearly exact with respect to characterizing findings in brain as either normal or abnormal.
Fast spin-echo and spin-echo MR of the brain produce images of similar quality and show white matter lesions equally well. These results support the replacement of slower, conventional spin-echo pulse sequences with faster fast spin-echo sequences.
尽管快速自旋回波图像和慢速自旋回波图像具有相似的对比特征,但这两种技术在脑成像的所有方面尚未被证明是等效的。为了确定这两种序列是否等效,我们比较了前瞻性选择的HIV血清阳性患者脑的快速自旋回波和自旋回波质子密度加权及T2加权磁共振图像上白质病变的检测、图像质量和伪影退化情况。
对153名连续受试者进行了脑的快速自旋回波和自旋回波磁共振成像。图像由三位经验丰富的神经放射科医生独立审查。比较了两种技术下白质病变的大小、数量和位置。图像质量、运动伪影、脑脊液流动伪影和灰白质区分度按五分制进行分级。
在灰白质区分度方面未发现统计学差异。快速自旋回波图像上的整体图像质量、脑脊液流动伪影和运动伪影略差(p <.05)。尽管在检测直径小于5毫米的病变时存在一些变异性,但差异很小,两种技术都能检测到所有较大的病变。在将脑内表现特征化为正常或异常方面,快速自旋回波和传统自旋回波技术之间的一致性几乎完全相同。
脑的快速自旋回波和自旋回波磁共振成像产生的图像质量相似,对白质病变的显示同样良好。这些结果支持用更快的快速自旋回波序列取代较慢的传统自旋回波脉冲序列。