Melhem E R, Patel R T, Whitehead R E, Bhatia R G, Rockwell D T, Jara H
Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, MA 02118, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Sep;171(3):797-802. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725319.
Our objective was to assess the usefulness of the dual-echo gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) technique in revealing acute hemorrhagic brain lesions and compare GRASE and fast spin-echo techniques for revealing acute hemorrhagic lesions and image artifacts.
Thirty-two consecutive patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage underwent dual-echo GRASE (TEeff1/TEeff2, 35/85) and fast spin-echo (25/110) imaging. The techniques were matched for TR (3032 msec), spatial resolution, and acquisition time. Two neuroradiologists reviewed the images independently, documenting the number, size (<1, >1, or 1 cm in diameter), location, and signal characteristics (hypointense versus hyperintense compared with brain) of detectable lesions. These observers also compared matched T2- and proton density-weighted GRASE and fast spin-echo images for paramagnetic lesion conspicuity, diamagnetic susceptibility artifacts, chemical shift artifacts along the phase- and frequency-encoding directions, and artifactual CSF hyperintensity in the thin curvilinear cortical sulci and the Virchow-Robin spaces on only the proton density-weighted images.
The average number and conspicuity of dark (paramagnetic) lesions were significantly greater on GRASE than on fast spin-echo images (p < .05 and p < .001, respectively). We found no significant difference in the average number of bright lesions revealed by either technique (p > .1). Chemical shift artifacts along the phase-encoding directions were more prominent on GRASE than on fast spin-echo imaging. Chemical shift artifacts along the frequency-encoding directions and artifactual CSF hyperintensity were more prominent on fast spin-echo than on GRASE imaging. No visually apparent difference was found in the degree of diamagnetic susceptibility artifacts seen with the two techniques.
Dual-echo GRASE imaging can be helpful in the examination of patients with suspected acute brain hemorrhage.
我们的目的是评估双回波梯度与自旋回波(GRASE)技术在显示急性出血性脑病变方面的效用,并比较GRASE和快速自旋回波技术在显示急性出血性病变及图像伪影方面的情况。
32例连续的急性颅内出血患者接受了双回波GRASE(有效回波时间1/有效回波时间2,35/85)和快速自旋回波(25/110)成像。这些技术在重复时间(3032毫秒)、空间分辨率和采集时间方面进行了匹配。两名神经放射科医生独立审查图像,记录可检测病变的数量、大小(直径<1厘米、>1厘米或1厘米)、位置以及信号特征(与脑相比为低信号与高信号)。这些观察者还比较了匹配的T2加权和质子密度加权的GRASE及快速自旋回波图像,以观察顺磁性病变的清晰度、抗磁性敏感性伪影、沿相位编码和频率编码方向的化学位移伪影,以及仅在质子密度加权图像上薄曲线形脑沟和Virchow-Robin间隙中的伪脑脊液高信号。
GRASE上暗(顺磁性)病变的平均数量和清晰度显著高于快速自旋回波图像(分别为p<.05和p<.001)。我们发现两种技术显示的亮病变平均数量无显著差异(p>.1)。沿相位编码方向的化学位移伪影在GRASE上比在快速自旋回波成像上更突出。沿频率编码方向的化学位移伪影和伪脑脊液高信号在快速自旋回波上比在GRASE成像上更突出。两种技术所见的抗磁性敏感性伪影程度在视觉上无明显差异。
双回波GRASE成像有助于对疑似急性脑出血患者进行检查。