• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种利用学生评价来评估教师发展需求的新型工具。

A Novel Tool to Assess Faculty Development Needs Utilizing Student Evaluations.

作者信息

Nausheen Fauzia, Bhupathy Renu, Mohsin Hina, Sheikh Shazia, Lyons Paul, Atapattu Dhammika N

机构信息

Medical Education, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74008. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.74008
PMID:39703265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11658909/
Abstract

Background Contemporary academic institutions confront substantial challenges in professional development amid rapid technological advancements. Historically, faculty professional development has relied on individual initiatives or peer assistance. Our medical school encountered analogous obstacles in implementing an innovative curriculum. Consequently, we established a faculty development program predicated on a needs assessment survey, student evaluations, and faculty performance appraisals. This study aimed to elucidate the development, implementation, and outcomes of our faculty professional development program interventions. Methods The faculty development program was initially constructed based on a survey of 17 founding faculty members. A descriptive analysis of the results was conducted and utilized to formulate a structured faculty development program. The implementation of the initial plan was primarily achieved through seminars and hands-on workshops. This was subsequently evaluated using end-of-course student feedback to determine the necessity for further faculty development. Based on these findings, additional faculty development sessions were implemented by external sources. Student evaluations were again employed to assess the efficacy of the faculty development sessions. Results Among the four main categories, the areas deemed most critical were as follows: (1) curriculum development themes, including the development of integrated courses and team-teaching courses (100%), designing student learning experiences (95%), and effective writing assignments (90%); (2) teaching skills, specifically obtaining training for effective team-based learning (100%); (3) assessment and evaluation, encompassing writing test questions (96%), assessing assignments (95%), and responding to students' self-assessments (95%); and (4) technology in academia, including online teaching resources, video conferencing, and webcasting skills (100%), creating voice-over PowerPoint(Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) presentations (95%), and training in online assessment platforms (96%). Student survey results indicated improved faculty performance in flipped classroom and laboratory session instruction. The program continues to evolve based on faculty and student input. Conclusion In addition to traditional faculty self-reflection and needs assessment methodologies, we discovered that student feedback provides a comprehensive perspective on faculty improvement and professional development requirements. Overall, the faculty development program demonstrated effectiveness and satisfaction among participants.

摘要

背景 在技术飞速发展的当下,当代学术机构在专业发展方面面临着巨大挑战。从历史上看,教师的专业发展依赖于个人主动性或同行协助。我们的医学院在实施创新课程时也遇到了类似的障碍。因此,我们基于需求评估调查、学生评价和教师绩效评估建立了一个教师发展项目。本研究旨在阐明我们的教师专业发展项目干预措施的发展、实施和成果。方法 教师发展项目最初是基于对17名创始教师的调查构建的。对结果进行了描述性分析,并用于制定结构化的教师发展项目。初始计划的实施主要通过研讨会和实践工作坊来实现。随后使用课程结束时的学生反馈进行评估,以确定进一步教师发展的必要性。基于这些发现,由外部资源实施了额外的教师发展课程。再次使用学生评价来评估教师发展课程的效果。结果 在四个主要类别中,被认为最关键的领域如下:(1)课程开发主题,包括综合课程和团队教学课程的开发(100%)、设计学生学习体验(95%)以及有效的写作作业(90%);(2)教学技能,特别是获得有效的基于团队的学习培训(100%);(3)评估与评价,包括编写测试题(96%)、评估作业(95%)以及回应学生的自我评估(95%);(4)学术领域的技术,包括在线教学资源、视频会议和网络直播技能(100%)、创建带有旁白的PowerPoint(微软公司,华盛顿州雷德蒙德)演示文稿(95%)以及在线评估平台培训(96%)。学生调查结果表明教师在翻转课堂和实验室课程教学方面的表现有所提高。该项目继续根据教师和学生的意见不断发展。结论 除了传统的教师自我反思和需求评估方法外,我们发现学生反馈为教师改进和专业发展需求提供了全面的视角。总体而言,教师发展项目在参与者中显示出有效性和满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/0c32e1435657/cureus-0016-00000074008-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/8feed570a913/cureus-0016-00000074008-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/3c2ff1e23b8d/cureus-0016-00000074008-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/9bf9f07bf631/cureus-0016-00000074008-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/25de3c6bb4cd/cureus-0016-00000074008-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/0c32e1435657/cureus-0016-00000074008-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/8feed570a913/cureus-0016-00000074008-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/3c2ff1e23b8d/cureus-0016-00000074008-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/9bf9f07bf631/cureus-0016-00000074008-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/25de3c6bb4cd/cureus-0016-00000074008-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba2d/11658909/0c32e1435657/cureus-0016-00000074008-i05.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Tool to Assess Faculty Development Needs Utilizing Student Evaluations.一种利用学生评价来评估教师发展需求的新型工具。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74008. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Introducing clinical laboratory science: CLS students help shape the future.介绍临床检验科学:临床检验科学专业的学生助力塑造未来。
Clin Lab Sci. 2006 Fall;19(4):206-13.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Implementing Systematic Faculty Development to Support an EPA-Based Program of Assessment: Strategies, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned.实施系统的教师发展计划以支持基于 EPA 的评估计划:策略、结果和经验教训。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(4):434-444. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1857256. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Effects of a long term faculty development program on improvement in quality of MCQs: an impact evaluation study.长期教师发展计划对改进多项选择题质量的影响:一项影响评估研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07081-2.
6
The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review.翻转课堂对提高本科健康专业教育学习成果的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;19(3):e1339. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1339. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
A Novel Virtual Emergency Medicine Residents-as-Teachers (RAT) Curriculum.一种新型的虚拟急诊医学住院医师即教师(RAT)课程。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;6(3):C9-C63. doi: 10.21980/J86S71. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
9
Mentoring for a new era.新时代的指导
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1171-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00041.
10
Implementation of online peer feedback for student self-reflection - first steps on the development of a feedback culture at a medical faculty.实施在线同伴反馈以促进学生自我反思——医学院反馈文化发展的初步举措。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Aug 15;36(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001250. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
An Interprofessional Faculty Development Program for Workplace-Based Learning.基于工作场所的学习的跨专业教师发展项目。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 May 1;13(1):266-273. doi: 10.5334/pme.1242. eCollection 2024.
2
Novel coronavirus, novel faculty development programs: rapid transition to eLearning during the pandemic.新型冠状病毒,新型教师发展项目:大流行期间快速转向电子学习。
J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25;48(5):446-449. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0197.
3
How perceptions of a successful physician-scientist varies with gender and academic rank: toward defining physician-scientist's success.
如何看待成功的医师科学家会因性别和学术排名而异:定义医师科学家的成功。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 13;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1960-9.
4
Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.分析和解释李克特量表的数据。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
5
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
6
The impact of a faculty development program: evaluation based on the self-assessment of medical educators from preclinical and clinical disciplines.一项师资发展计划的影响:基于临床前和临床学科医学教育者自我评估的评价。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Jun;34(2):35-40. doi: 10.1152/advan.00024.2010.
7
A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.旨在提高医学教育教学效果的教师发展举措的系统评价:BEME指南第8号
Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-526. doi: 10.1080/01421590600902976.
8
Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.李克特量表:如何(滥)用它们。
Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1217-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
9
Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development.改善教学实践的策略:教师发展的综合方法。
Acad Med. 1998 Apr;73(4):387-96. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00011.
10
What clinical teachers in medicine need to know.医学临床教师需要了解的内容。
Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):333-42. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003.