Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Steer P J, Ratnam S S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Mar;20(1):35-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1994.tb00418.x.
Fourteen women admitted in early labor, with intact membranes, were studied. In each woman, two catheters were inserted transcervically; one catheter was inserted into the extraamniotic space before rupture of membranes, and the second catheter was inserted, after artificial rupture of membranes into the intraamniotic cavity. The contraction to contraction difference in active pressure (pressure above the baseline) recorded by the two catheters, as well as the cumulative total active pressure generated (calculated by adding the active pressure of all contractions) throughout labor by the two catheters were compared. Of the 606 contractions analysed, 43.2% showed pressure difference of 0-5 mmHg between the intra amniotic and extraamniotic catheter; 21.3% showed 6-10 mmHg difference, 12.2% showed a difference of 11-15 mmHg, and 23.3% showed a difference greater than 15 mmHg. When total active pressure generated by each catheter for individual patients was calculated, the percentage difference varied from 2.3% to 53.7%. Intrauterine pressure measurements in labour using transducer-tipped catheters inserted in the extraamniotic space may not provide comparable information to a similar catheter inserted intraamniotically when membranes are ruptured.
对14名胎膜完整且处于分娩早期的孕妇进行了研究。在每位孕妇身上,经宫颈插入两根导管;一根导管在胎膜破裂前插入羊膜外间隙,另一根导管在人工破膜后插入羊膜腔内。比较了两根导管记录的主动压力(基线以上的压力)在宫缩之间的差异,以及两根导管在整个分娩过程中产生的主动压力累计总和(通过将所有宫缩的主动压力相加计算得出)。在分析的606次宫缩中,43.2%的宫缩显示羊膜腔内导管与羊膜外导管之间的压力差为0 - 5 mmHg;21.3%的宫缩显示压力差为6 - 10 mmHg,12.2%的宫缩显示压力差为11 - 15 mmHg,23.3%的宫缩显示压力差大于15 mmHg。当计算每位患者各导管产生的主动压力总和时,百分比差异在2.3%至53.7%之间。在胎膜破裂时,使用插入羊膜外间隙的传感器尖端导管进行分娩时的宫内压力测量,可能无法提供与插入羊膜腔内的类似导管可比的信息。