Sultan A H, Kamm M A, Hudson C N, Bartram C I
St Bartholomew's (Homerton) Hospital, London.
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):887-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887.
To determine (i) risk factors in the development of third degree obstetric tears and (ii) the success of primary sphincter repair.
(i) Retrospective analysis of obstetric variables in 50 women who had sustained a third degree tear, compared with the remaining 8553 vaginal deliveries during the same period. (ii) Women who had sustained a third degree tear and had primary sphincter repair and control subjects were interviewed and investigated with anal endosonography, anal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements.
Antenatal clinic in teaching hospital in inner London.
(i) All women (n = 8603) who delivered vaginally over a 31 month period. (ii) 34 women who sustained a third degree tear and 88 matched controls.
Obstetric risk factors, defecatory symptoms, sonographic sphincter defects, and pudendal nerve damage.
(i) Factors significantly associated with development of a third degree tear were: forceps delivery (50% v 7% in controls; P = 0.00001), primiparous delivery (85% v 43%; P = 0.00001), birth weight > 4 kg (P = 0.00002), and occipito-posterior position at delivery (P = 0.003). No third degree tear occurred during 351 vacuum extractions. Eleven of 25 (44%) women who were delivered without instruments and had a third degree tear did so despite a posterolateral episiotomy. (ii) Anal incontinence or faecal urgency was present in 16 women with tears and 11 controls (47% v 13%; P = 0.00001). Sonographic sphincter defects were identified in 29 with tears and 29 controls (85% v 33%; P = 0.00001). Every symptomatic patient had persistent combined internal and external sphincter defects, and these were associated with significantly lower anal pressures. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements were not significantly different.
Vacuum extraction is associated with fewer third degree tears than forceps delivery. An episiotomy does not always prevent a third degree tear. Primary repair is inadequate in most women who sustain third degree tears, most having residual sphincter defects and about half experiencing anal incontinence, which is caused by persistent mechanical sphincter disruption rather than pudendal nerve damage. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and surgical techniques of repair.
确定(i)三度产科裂伤发生的危险因素,以及(ii)一期括约肌修复的成功率。
(i)对50例发生三度裂伤的产妇的产科变量进行回顾性分析,并与同期其余8553例阴道分娩进行比较。(ii)对发生三度裂伤并接受一期括约肌修复的产妇及对照者进行访谈,并采用肛门腔内超声、肛门测压和阴部神经终末运动潜伏期测量进行检查。
伦敦市中心教学医院的产前门诊。
(i)在31个月期间阴道分娩的所有产妇(n = 8603)。(ii)34例发生三度裂伤的产妇和88例匹配的对照者。
产科危险因素、排便症状、超声检查发现的括约肌缺陷和阴部神经损伤。
(i)与三度裂伤发生显著相关的因素有:产钳助产(50%对对照组的7%;P = 0.00001)、初产(85%对43%;P = 0.00001)、出生体重>4 kg(P = 0.00002)以及分娩时枕后位(P = 0.003)。351例真空吸引助产中未发生三度裂伤。25例未使用器械助产且发生三度裂伤的产妇中,有11例(44%)尽管进行了后外侧会阴切开术仍发生了裂伤。(ii)16例裂伤产妇和11例对照者存在肛门失禁或排便急迫感(47%对13%;P = 0.00001)。29例裂伤产妇和29例对照者经超声检查发现括约肌缺陷(85%对33%;P = 0.00001)。每例有症状的患者均存在持续性内外括约肌联合缺陷,且这些缺陷与明显较低的肛门压力相关。阴部神经终末运动潜伏期测量结果无显著差异。
与产钳助产相比,真空吸引助产导致的三度裂伤较少。会阴切开术并不总能预防三度裂伤。大多数发生三度裂伤的产妇一期修复效果不佳,多数存在残余括约肌缺陷,约半数出现肛门失禁,这是由持续性机械性括约肌破坏而非阴部神经损伤所致。应关注预防性产科操作和修复手术技术。