• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities. Drug Committee of the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

作者信息

Bochner F, Martin E D, Burgess N G, Somogyi A A, Misan G M

机构信息

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):901-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.901.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.308.6933.901
PMID:8173373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2539814/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/2539814/ed86278a71f7/bmj00434-0042-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/2539814/ed86278a71f7/bmj00434-0042-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4011/2539814/ed86278a71f7/bmj00434-0042-a.jpg

相似文献

1
How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities. Drug Committee of the Royal Adelaide Hospital.医院如何进行药品配给？一家教学医院的药品配给：一种确定优先级的方法。阿德莱德皇家医院药品委员会。
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):901-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.901.
2
How can hospitals ration drugs? Fairness is at issue.医院如何合理分配药品？公平性是个问题。
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):907; discussion 907-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.907.
3
How can hospitals ration drugs? Formulate, don't formularise.医院如何合理分配药品？要制定方案，而不是搞药品处方集。
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):905-6; discussion 907-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.905.
4
How can hospitals ration drugs? First consider the overall process of care.医院如何合理分配药品？首先考虑整体护理过程。
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):906; discussion 907-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.906.
5
Pharmaceuticals in Australia: priorities in a teaching hospital.
Physician Exec. 1993 Sep-Oct;19(5):63-7.
6
Ethics, institutional complexity and health care reform: the struggle for normative balance.伦理、制度复杂性与医疗改革：对规范平衡的探寻
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1994 Spring;10:93-104.
7
The rising cost of pharmaceuticals: an ethicist's perspective.药品成本的不断攀升：一位伦理学家的视角
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993 Aug;50(Suppl. 4):S10-2.
8
The Few. The Effective. The Cheapest. The Waste-Free Formulary.精选。高效。价廉。无浪费处方集。
Manag Care. 2018 Aug;27(8):17-18.
9
Priority setting in a hospital drug formulary: a qualitative case study and evaluation.医院药品处方集的优先级设定：一项定性案例研究与评估
Health Policy. 2003 Dec;66(3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(03)00063-0.
10
Drug cost containment at a large teaching hospital.大型教学医院的药品成本控制
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 May;1(5):377-82. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201050-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals: a review of empirical studies.医院医疗保健优先级的设定：实证研究综述
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Apr;30(3):386-96. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu010. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
2
What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?加拿大安大略省的医院决策者对于其所在机构中确定优先次序的公平性有何看法？
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Jan 21;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-8.
3
Hospital prescribing errors: epidemiological assessment of predictors.

本文引用的文献

1
Priorities in health care: reply to Lewis and Charny.医疗保健的优先事项：对刘易斯和查尔尼的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):33-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.1.33.
2
Rationing.配给
BMJ. 1993 Feb 6;306(6874):395. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6874.395-b.
3
Health care technology and the inevitability of resource allocation and rationing decisions. Part II.医疗保健技术与资源分配及配给决策的必然性。第二部分。
医院处方错误：预测因素的流行病学评估
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Mar;53(3):326-31. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.bjcp1558.doc.x.
4
Dutch hospital drug formularies: pharmacotherapeutic variation and conservatism, but concurrence with national pharmacotherapeutic guidelines.荷兰医院药品处方集：药物治疗的差异与保守性，但与国家药物治疗指南一致。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Mar;49(3):254-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00166.x.
5
Drug and Therapeutics (D & T) committees in Dutch hospitals: a nation-wide survey of structure, activities, and drug selection procedures.荷兰医院的药物与治疗学（D&T）委员会：一项关于结构、活动及药物选择程序的全国性调查。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;48(2):239-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00001.x.
6
Rational pharmacotherapy in The Netherlands: formulary management in Dutch hospitals.荷兰的合理药物治疗：荷兰医院的处方集管理
Pharm World Sci. 1999 Apr;21(2):74-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1008654609916.
7
Costs of treating dystonias and hemifacial spasm with botulinum toxin A.用A型肉毒杆菌毒素治疗肌张力障碍和半面痉挛的成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Dec;12(6):695-706. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712060-00009.
8
Drug rationing in the UK National Health Service. Current status and future prospects.英国国民医疗服务体系中的药物配给。现状与未来展望。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Sep;12(3):339-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712030-00006.
9
Constraints on antidepressant prescribing and principles of cost-effective antidepressant use. Part 2: Cost-effectiveness analyses.抗抑郁药处方的限制及抗抑郁药成本效益使用原则。第2部分：成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jun;11(6):515-37. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711060-00002.
10
Constraints on antidepressant prescribing and principles of cost-effective antidepressant use. Part 1: Depression and its treatment.抗抑郁药物处方的限制及具有成本效益的抗抑郁药物使用原则。第1部分：抑郁症及其治疗。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 May;11(5):419-43. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00005.
JAMA. 1983;249(16):2208-19.
4
The doctor's dilemma - and society's too.医生的两难困境——也是社会的两难困境。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Mar 15;310(11):718-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198403153101111.
5
Rationing hospital care. Lessons from Britain.医院护理配给。来自英国的经验教训。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Jan 5;310(1):52-6. doi: 10.1056/nejm198401053100120.
6
The "rationing" of medical care.医疗保健的“定量配给”
N Engl J Med. 1984 Dec 13;311(24):1572-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198412133112411.
7
Why saying no to patients in the United States is so hard. Cost containment, justice, and provider autonomy.为何在美国对患者说“不”如此困难。成本控制、公平性与医疗服务提供者的自主权。
N Engl J Med. 1986 May 22;314(21):1380-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198605223142109.
8
All for one or one for all? The ethics of resource allocation for health care.人人为我，我为人人？医疗保健资源分配的伦理问题。
Med J Aust. 1987 Jul 20;147(2):68-71. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb133262.x.
9
Dealing with limited resources. The Oregon decision to curtail funding for organ transplantation.应对资源有限。俄勒冈州削减器官移植资金的决定。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 21;319(3):171-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807213190310.
10
The trouble with rationing.定量配给的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 27;323(13):911-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199009273231310.