Dodel R C, Kirchner A, Koehne-Volland R, Künig G, Ceballos-Baumann A, Naumann M, Brashear A, Richter H P, Szucs T D, Oertel W H
Department of Neurology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Dec;12(6):695-706. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712060-00009.
Botulinum toxin (BTX) has become a safe and effective therapeutic tool in the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders, especially dystonias. One major disadvantage, however, is the high cost of a single injection of BTX. In this study of 835 patients, we calculated the cost of treatment with BTX serotype A (BTX-A) for different dystonias and hemifacial spasm. The annual expenditure per patient for BTX-A injections in this cohort totalled (mean +/- standard deviation) 1030 Deutschmarks (DM) [1996 values] +/- DM610 [$US570 +/- $US340; 230 +/- 130 pounds sterling (Pound)] for blepharospasm (n = 158), DM1450 +/- DM1520 ($US800 +/- $US830; 310 Pounds +/- 280 Pounds) for craniocervical dystonia (n = 148), and DM1480 +/- DM780 ($US810 +/- $US430; 330 Pounds +/- 180 Pounds) for oromandibular dystonia (n = 16), while the treatment of cervical dystonia consumed DM4590 +/- DM2060 ($US2520 +/- $US1130; 960 Pounds +/- 420 Pounds) [n = 362] per patient. In order to alleviate symptoms in patients with hemifacial spasm (n = 151), DM510 +/- DM270 ($US280 +/- $US150; 110 Pounds +/- 60 Pounds) had to be spent annually. The expenses for surgical therapy for cervical dystonia were DM10,120 +/- DM1900 (n = 54). No major differences concerning expenditure could be found in this study between the 2 available preparations of BTX. However, there appeared to be a lower rate of adverse effects with the Botox formulation, compared with the Dysport formulation, of BTX-A (this difference was statistically significant, i.e. p < 0.001). Although the cost of an individual injection is high, other cost factors also substantially contribute to the societal costs of adult-onset dystonias. Some of these costs may be attenuated with the use of BTX. The subjective and objective relief of these socially devastating and sometimes painful conditions rewards the expenditure associated with the use of BTX-A.
肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)已成为治疗多种神经系统疾病,尤其是肌张力障碍的一种安全有效的治疗手段。然而,一个主要缺点是单次注射BTX的成本高昂。在这项对835名患者的研究中,我们计算了A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX-A)治疗不同类型肌张力障碍和半面痉挛的成本。该队列中每位患者每年注射BTX-A的费用总计(均值±标准差)为:眼睑痉挛(n = 158)患者1030德国马克(DM)[1996年价值]±610 DM(570美元±340美元;230英镑±130英镑);颅颈肌张力障碍(n = 148)患者1450 DM±1520 DM(800美元±830美元;310英镑±280英镑);口下颌肌张力障碍(n = 16)患者1480 DM±780 DM(810美元±430美元;330英镑±180英镑);而颈部肌张力障碍的治疗每位患者花费4590 DM±2060 DM(2520美元±1130美元;960英镑±420英镑)[n = 362]。为缓解半面痉挛患者(n = 151)的症状,每年需花费510 DM±270 DM(280美元±150美元;110英镑±60英镑)。颈部肌张力障碍手术治疗的费用为10120 DM±1900 DM(n = 54)。在这项研究中,两种可用的BTX制剂在支出方面未发现重大差异。然而,与Dysport制剂相比,Botox制剂的BTX-A不良反应发生率似乎较低(这种差异具有统计学意义,即p < 0.001)。尽管单次注射成本高昂,但其他成本因素也在很大程度上导致了成人起病肌张力障碍的社会成本。使用BTX可能会减轻其中一些成本。这些对社会具有破坏性且有时令人痛苦的病症在主观和客观上的缓解,使得与使用BTX-A相关的支出物有所值。