Department of Anthropology, University College London, UK.
Global Health. 2009 Oct 14;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-5-13.
The Global Movement for Mental Health has brought renewed attention to the neglect of people with mental illness within health policy worldwide. The maltreatment of the mentally ill in many low-income countries is widely reported within psychiatric hospitals, informal healing centres, and family homes. International agencies have called for the development of legislation and policy to address these abuses. However such initiatives exemplify a top-down approach to promoting human rights which historically has had limited impact at the level of those living with mental illness and their families.
This research forms part of a longitudinal anthropological study of people with severe mental illness in rural Ghana. Visits were made to over 40 households with a family member with mental illness, as well as churches, shrines, hospitals and clinics. Ethnographic methods included observation, conversation, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with people with mental illness, carers, healers, health workers and community members.
Chaining and beating of the mentally ill was found to be commonplace in homes and treatment centres in the communities studied, as well as with-holding of food ('fasting'). However responses to mental illness were embedded within spiritual and moral perspectives and such treatment provoked little sanction at the local level. Families struggled to provide care for severely mentally ill relatives with very little support from formal health services. Psychiatric services were difficult to access, particularly in rural communities, and also seen to have limitations in their effectiveness. Traditional and faith healers remained highly popular despite the routine maltreatment of the mentally ill in their facilities.
Efforts to promote the human rights of those with mental illness must engage with the experiences of mental illness within communities affected in order to grasp how these may underpin the use of practices such as mechanical restraint. Interventions which operate at the local level with those living with mental illness within rural communities, as well as family members and healers, may have greater potential to effect change in the treatment of the mentally ill than legislation or investment in services alone.
全球精神卫生运动使人们重新关注到全世界卫生政策中对精神疾病患者的忽视。在许多低收入国家,精神疾病患者在精神病院、非正规治疗中心和家庭护理院受到虐待,这一现象屡见不鲜。国际机构呼吁制定立法和政策来解决这些虐待行为。然而,此类举措代表了一种自上而下的促进人权的方法,从历史上看,这种方法对那些患有精神疾病的人和他们的家人的影响有限。
这项研究是对加纳农村地区严重精神疾病患者进行的纵向人类学研究的一部分。研究人员走访了 40 多个有精神疾病患者的家庭,以及教堂、神龛、医院和诊所。人种学方法包括观察、交谈、对精神疾病患者、照顾者、治疗师、卫生工作者和社区成员进行半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。
研究发现,在研究社区的家庭和治疗中心,以及扣留食物(“禁食”)的情况下,对精神疾病患者进行捆绑和殴打是很常见的。然而,对精神疾病的反应是嵌入在精神和道德观点中的,这种治疗在当地很少受到制裁。家庭努力为严重精神疾病患者提供护理,但几乎得不到正规卫生服务的支持。精神卫生服务难以获得,特别是在农村社区,而且其效果也被认为存在局限性。尽管在他们的设施中经常对精神疾病患者进行虐待,传统和信仰治疗师仍然非常受欢迎。
促进精神疾病患者人权的努力必须与受影响社区的精神疾病患者的经历相契合,以理解这些经历如何构成对机械约束等做法的使用。在农村社区与那些患有精神疾病的患者以及他们的家庭成员和治疗师一起在当地一级开展的干预措施,可能比立法或投资于服务更有潜力改变对精神疾病患者的治疗方式。